Mary L. Piven
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Oncology
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ruth A. AndersonCathleen Colón‐EmericQueen Utley‐SmithKirsten CorazziniNatalie AmmarellDonald E. BaileyDeborah K. MayerDonald L. Rosenstein
- Topics
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (13 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers)Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of PsychiatryJournal of the American Geriatrics SocietyQualitative Health Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomBelgium
In The Last Decade
Mary L. Piven
16 papers receiving 568 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- General Health Professions 339
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 155
- Clinical Psychology 133
- Oncology 119
- Psychiatry and Mental health 109
Countries citing papers authored by Mary L. Piven
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary L. Piven's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary L. Piven with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary L. Piven more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary L. Piven
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary L. Piven. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary L. Piven. The network helps show where Mary L. Piven may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary L. Piven
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary L. Piven. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary L. Piven based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary L. Piven. Mary L. Piven is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 184 | |
| 2 | 46 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 61 | |
| 5 | Paying attention: A leap toward quality care. | 4 |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 36 | |
| 8 | 69 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | "The Golden Rule": Only a starting point for quality care. | 5 |
| 13 | 82 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2 |
About Mary L. Piven
Mary L. Piven is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 16 papers that have together received 610 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (13 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (55 citations), General Health Professions (339 citations) and Research and Theory (8 citations). Mary L. Piven has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Ruth A. Anderson, Cathleen Colón‐Emeric, Queen Utley‐Smith, Kirsten Corazzini, Natalie Ammarell, Donald E. Bailey, Deborah K. Mayer, Donald L. Rosenstein, Deborah Lekan-Rutledge and Reuben R. McDaniel. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society and Qualitative Health Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.