Mary Jane Smith

57 papers receiving 998 citations

Peers

Mary Jane Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Research and Theory 57
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 55
  • Leadership and Management 19
  • General Health Professions 205
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 37
Replace Patricia M. Schwirian with:
Patricia M. Schwirian United States
Bonnie Bullough United States
Patricia White United States
Miyuki Takase Japan
Sarah Jeong Australia
Angela C. Wolff Canada
Daniel Terry Australia
Lauretta Luck Australia
Yu Xu United States
Gary Hickey United Kingdom
Mary Jane Smith relative to Patricia M. Schwirian United States Patricia M. Schwirian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Patricia M. Schwirian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Jane Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Jane Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Jane Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Jane Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Jane Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Jane Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Jane Smith. The network helps show where Mary Jane Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary Jane Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary Jane Smith Line = papers co-authored together Mary Jane Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Nursing Research: Qualitative Methods
1985155
2 2018153
3 198185
4 199982
5 200952
6 199252
7 199443
8 198839
9 198638
10 200535
11 199930
12 201629
13 201824
14 197722
15 201520
16 201618
17 199218
18 201316
19 202013
20 202012

About Mary Jane Smith

Mary Jane Smith is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Speech and Hearing and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (6 papers), Noise Effects and Management (4 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (3 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (3 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (3 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (2 papers), Nursing education and management (2 papers) and Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (57 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (55 citations), Leadership and Management (19 citations), General Health Professions (205 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (37 citations). Mary Jane Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Patricia Liehr, Rosemarie Rizzo Parse, Ann Coyne, Stuart A. Aaronson, E. Premkumar Reddy, H. C. Clark, Joyce J. Fitzpatrick, Jeffrey Aubé, Joseph A. Heppert and Zhiwei Gao. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Science Quarterly, Advances in Nursing Science, Applied Nursing Research, Holistic Nursing Practice and Nursing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact