Mary J. Scott
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Genetics
- Physiology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- M. de Burgh DalyRhona MacLeodJohn CarmodyNeil K. KochenourJames R. ScottLuis JáureguiJames H. ReeseKenneth Bachmann
- Topics
- Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (10 papers)Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (9 papers)High Altitude and Hypoxia (5 papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of PhysiologyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Mary J. Scott
17 papers receiving 490 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 379
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 364
- Genetics 134
- Physiology 128
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 124
Countries citing papers authored by Mary J. Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary J. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary J. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary J. Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary J. Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary J. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary J. Scott. The network helps show where Mary J. Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary J. Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary J. Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary J. Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary J. Scott. Mary J. Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 115 | |
| 13 | 157 | |
| 14 | 31 | |
| 15 | 28 | |
| 16 | 186 | |
| 17 | 5 |
About Mary J. Scott
Mary J. Scott is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Transplantation, having authored 17 papers that have together received 650 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (10 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (9 papers) and High Altitude and Hypoxia (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (379 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (364 citations) and Emergency Medicine (52 citations). Mary J. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include M. de Burgh Daly, Rhona MacLeod, John Carmody, Neil K. Kochenour, James R. Scott, Luis Jáuregui, James H. Reese, Kenneth Bachmann, Timothy J. Sullivan and Jennifer L. Stotka. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.