Mary I. Benedict

906 total citations
14 papers, 709 citations indexed

About

Mary I. Benedict is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Safety Research and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary I. Benedict has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 709 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Clinical Psychology, 7 papers in Safety Research and 5 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Mary I. Benedict's work include Child Abuse and Trauma (9 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (7 papers) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (4 papers). Mary I. Benedict is often cited by papers focused on Child Abuse and Trauma (9 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (7 papers) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (4 papers). Mary I. Benedict collaborates with scholars based in United States. Mary I. Benedict's co-authors include Roger B. White, Susan J. Zuravin, D. Brandt, Rebecca Stallings, Mark R. Somerfield, Lisa L. Paine, Lori Paine, Belinda J. Hall, Helen Abbey and Michele A. Kelley and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Public Health, Child Abuse & Neglect and American Journal of Orthopsychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Mary I. Benedict

14 papers receiving 628 citations

Peers

Mary I. Benedict
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Clinical Psychology 547
  • Safety Research 396
  • Sociology and Political Science 250
  • General Health Professions 166
  • Health 94
Replace Bryn King with:
Bryn King Canada
Judith Harwin United Kingdom
Linnea Klee United States
Marla McDaniel United States
Elizabeth Dawes Knight United States
Amanda L.R. O'Reilly United States
Lena Hedin Sweden
Stephanie Taplin Australia
Joyce James United States
Vandna Sinha Canada
Bryn King Canada View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Mary I. Benedict
Mary I. Benedict · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Mary I. Benedict
Mary I. Benedict · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Mary I. Benedict

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary I. Benedict's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary I. Benedict with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary I. Benedict more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary I. Benedict

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary I. Benedict. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary I. Benedict. The network helps show where Mary I. Benedict may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary I. Benedict

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary I. Benedict. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary I. Benedict based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary I. Benedict. Mary I. Benedict is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 106
2 55
3
Adult functioning of children who lived in kin versus nonrelative family foster homes.
141
4 59
5 46
6 25
7
A comparison of the auscultated acceleration test and the nonstress test as predictors of perinatal outcomes.
10
8
Factors associated with foster care length of stay.
82
9 62
10 14
11 22
12 28
13 42
14 17

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026