Mary Gleason

2.8k total citations
46 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

Mary Gleason is a scholar working on Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary Gleason has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 42 papers in Ecology, 23 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and 22 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Mary Gleason's work include Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (32 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (23 papers) and Marine and fisheries research (19 papers). Mary Gleason is often cited by papers focused on Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (32 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (23 papers) and Marine and fisheries research (19 papers). Mary Gleason collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Chile. Mary Gleason's co-authors include Evan Fox, Matt Merrifield, John Ugoretz, Jono R. Wilson, Rebecca Weeks, Alan T. White, Melissa Miller-Henson, Darcy Bradley, Paulo Serpa and Kevin L. Rhodes and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Mary Gleason

46 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary Gleason United States 22 1.4k 1.1k 649 451 234 46 1.9k
Julia Stewart Lowndes United States 10 1.3k 0.9× 1.0k 1.0× 687 1.1× 640 1.4× 191 0.8× 14 2.2k
Catherine Longo United States 19 1.3k 0.9× 1.1k 1.1× 603 0.9× 451 1.0× 376 1.6× 41 2.1k
Vivitskaia Tulloch Australia 26 1.4k 1.0× 928 0.9× 386 0.6× 434 1.0× 336 1.4× 51 2.0k
Juan Mayorga United States 13 1.0k 0.7× 1.2k 1.1× 442 0.7× 253 0.6× 285 1.2× 20 2.0k
Kimberly A. Selkoe United States 10 1.0k 0.7× 960 0.9× 425 0.7× 411 0.9× 184 0.8× 14 1.8k
Sylvaine Giakoumi Greece 27 1.8k 1.3× 1.6k 1.5× 565 0.9× 556 1.2× 304 1.3× 51 2.5k
Piers K. Dunstan Australia 29 1.5k 1.1× 1.1k 1.0× 455 0.7× 839 1.9× 410 1.8× 59 2.4k
Dan Laffoley Switzerland 23 1.4k 1.0× 950 0.9× 1.0k 1.6× 454 1.0× 128 0.5× 51 2.2k
Kerry Sink South Africa 23 877 0.6× 766 0.7× 468 0.7× 328 0.7× 237 1.0× 89 1.5k
Trevor Ward Australia 21 908 0.6× 807 0.8× 340 0.5× 382 0.8× 189 0.8× 48 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Gleason

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Gleason's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Gleason with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Gleason more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Gleason

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Gleason. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Gleason. The network helps show where Mary Gleason may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Gleason

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Gleason. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Gleason based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Gleason. Mary Gleason is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gleason, Mary, et al.. (2024). Stereo-video landers can rapidly assess marine fish diversity and community assemblages. Frontiers in Marine Science. 11. 2 indexed citations
2.
Bell, Tom W., Kyle C. Cavanaugh, Vienna R. Saccomanno, et al.. (2023). Kelpwatch: A new visualization and analysis tool to explore kelp canopy dynamics reveals variable response to and recovery from marine heatwaves. PLoS ONE. 18(3). e0271477–e0271477. 29 indexed citations
3.
Wu, Grace C., Ryan Jones, James H. Williams, et al.. (2023). Minimizing habitat conflicts in meeting net-zero energy targets in the western United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 120(4). e2204098120–e2204098120. 24 indexed citations
4.
Gleason, Mary, et al.. (2023). The importance of identifying and protecting coastal wildness. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4. 1 indexed citations
5.
Saccomanno, Vienna R., Tom W. Bell, Katherine C. Cavanaugh, et al.. (2022). Using unoccupied aerial vehicles to map and monitor changes in emergent kelp canopy after an ecological regime shift. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 9(1). 62–75. 8 indexed citations
6.
Bellquist, Lyall, et al.. (2022). U.S. exempted fishing permits: Role, value, and lessons learned for adaptive fisheries management. Marine Policy. 138. 104992–104992. 3 indexed citations
7.
Geyer, Roland, et al.. (2022). Quantity and fate of synthetic microfiber emissions from apparel washing in California and strategies for their reduction. Environmental Pollution. 298. 118835–118835. 24 indexed citations
8.
Scarborough, Courtney, et al.. (2022). The historical ecology of coastal California. Ocean & Coastal Management. 230. 106352–106352. 8 indexed citations
9.
Bellquist, Lyall, Vienna R. Saccomanno, Brice X. Semmens, Mary Gleason, & Jono R. Wilson. (2021). The rise in climate change-induced federal fishery disasters in the United States. PeerJ. 9. e11186–e11186. 29 indexed citations
10.
Gleason, Mary, et al.. (2021). Ecosystem-based management for kelp forest ecosystems. Marine Policy. 136. 104919–104919. 21 indexed citations
11.
Wilson, Jono R., et al.. (2020). Beyond protection: Fisheries co-benefits of no-take marine reserves. Marine Policy. 122. 104224–104224. 16 indexed citations
12.
Bellquist, Lyall, et al.. (2018). Reducing bycatch through a risk pool: A case study of the U.S. West Coast groundfish fishery. Marine Policy. 96. 90–99. 13 indexed citations
13.
Wilson, Jono R., Serena Lomonico, Darcy Bradley, et al.. (2018). Adaptive comanagement to achieve climate‐ready fisheries. Conservation Letters. 11(6). 47 indexed citations
14.
Starr, Richard M., et al.. (2016). Targeting Abundant Fish Stocks while Avoiding Overfished Species: Video and Fishing Surveys to Inform Management after Long-Term Fishery Closures. PLoS ONE. 11(12). e0168645–e0168645. 14 indexed citations
15.
Calil, Juliano, et al.. (2015). Aligning Natural Resource Conservation and Flood Hazard Mitigation in California. PLoS ONE. 10(7). e0132651–e0132651. 32 indexed citations
16.
Gleason, Mary, John J. Kirlin, & Evan Fox. (2012). California's marine protected area network planning process: Introduction to the special issue. Ocean & Coastal Management. 74. 1–2. 9 indexed citations
17.
Halpern, Benjamin S., Jordan Diamond, Steven D. Gaines, et al.. (2011). Near-term priorities for the science, policy and practice of Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning (CMSP). Marine Policy. 36(1). 198–205. 108 indexed citations
18.
Laffoley, Dan, et al.. (2008). Establishing resilient marine protected area networks - making it happen : full technical version, including ecological, social and governance considerations, as well as case studies. IUCN eBooks. 4 indexed citations
19.
Gleason, Mary, et al.. (2006). Assessing gaps in marine conservation in California. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 4(5). 249–258. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026