Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Strategies to avoid the loss of developmental potential in more than 200 million children in the developing world
2007755 citationsPatrice L. Engle, Maureen M. Black et al.The Lancetprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Mary Eming Young
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Eming Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Eming Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Eming Young more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Eming Young
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Eming Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Eming Young. The network helps show where Mary Eming Young may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Eming Young
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Eming Young.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Eming Young based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Eming Young. Mary Eming Young is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Young, Mary Eming, et al.. (2007). Early Child Development : From Measurement to Action. The World Bank eBooks.19 indexed citations
7.
Engle, Patrice L., Maureen M. Black, Jere R. Behrman, et al.. (2007). Strategies to avoid the loss of developmental potential in more than 200 million children in the developing world. The Lancet. 369(9557). 229–242.755 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Young, Mary Eming, et al.. (2006). Preventing youth risky behavior through early child development. 1. 1–4.1 indexed citations
9.
Young, Mary Eming, et al.. (2003). Desarrollo Infantil Temprano: lecciones de los programas no formales. Actualidad Contable FACES.17 indexed citations
Young, Mary Eming. (1997). Early child development : investing in our children's future : proceedings of a World Bank Conference on Early Child Development : Investing in the Future, Atlanta, Georgia, April 8-9, 1996. Elsevier eBooks.5 indexed citations
14.
Young, Mary Eming. (1996). Early Child Development: Investing in the Future. Medical Entomology and Zoology.92 indexed citations
15.
Young, Mary Eming. (1995). Investing in Young Children. World Bank Discussion Papers No. 275..3 indexed citations
16.
Young, Mary Eming. (1995). Investing in Young Children. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.40 indexed citations
17.
Young, Mary Eming. (1994). Integrated early child development : challenges and opportunities. 1.4 indexed citations
18.
Young, Mary Eming. (1994). Health problems and policies for older women : an emerging issue in developing countries. 1.3 indexed citations
19.
Young, Mary Eming. (1985). Child health in China. World Bank eBooks. 1.8 indexed citations
20.
Young, Mary Eming, et al.. (1985). Child Health in China. World Bank Staff Working Papers, Number 767..1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.