Mary Ellen Stoykov
- Rehabilitation top 0.2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Neurology top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jennifer StevensFerdinando A. Mussa-IvaldiMark KovicJames L. PattonSangeetha MadhavanDaniel M. CorcosDerek G. KamperKristen M. Triandafilou
- Topics
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (32 papers)Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (15 papers)Motor Control and Adaptation (10 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaStrokeExperimental Brain Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesColombiaBahrain
In The Last Decade
Mary Ellen Stoykov
34 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Rehabilitation 1.2k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 638
- Biomedical Engineering 591
- Neurology 465
- Psychiatry and Mental health 322
Countries citing papers authored by Mary Ellen Stoykov
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Ellen Stoykov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Ellen Stoykov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Ellen Stoykov more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Ellen Stoykov
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Ellen Stoykov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Ellen Stoykov. The network helps show where Mary Ellen Stoykov may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Ellen Stoykov
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Ellen Stoykov. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Ellen Stoykov based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Ellen Stoykov. Mary Ellen Stoykov is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 47 | |
| 12 | 49 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 131 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 189 | |
| 18 | 35 | |
| 19 | 294 | |
| 20 | 86 |
About Mary Ellen Stoykov
Mary Ellen Stoykov is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Neurology and Neurology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (32 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (15 papers) and Motor Control and Adaptation (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (1.2k citations), Neurology (306 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (638 citations). Mary Ellen Stoykov has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Colombia and Bahrain. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer Stevens, Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi, Mark Kovic, James L. Patton, Sangeetha Madhavan, Daniel M. Corcos, Derek G. Kamper, Kristen M. Triandafilou, Yicheng Jia and Robert V. Kenyon. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Stroke and Experimental Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.