Mary E. Reed

19 papers receiving 189 citations

Peers

Mary E. Reed
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Internal Medicine 25
  • Health Information Management 33
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Emergency Medicine 13
  • General Health Professions 32
Replace Eli Mlaver with:
Eli Mlaver United States
Eugene Lucas United States
Doug Einstadter United States
Jean-Baptiste Anzouan-Kacou Ivory Coast
Corey Lyon United States
José Castela Forte Netherlands
Bernard D. Frijling Netherlands
Sena Chae United States
Arnfinn Rollag Norway
Isabel Dostal United Kingdom
Mary E. Reed relative to Eli Mlaver United States Eli Mlaver's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Eli Mlaver · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary E. Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary E. Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary E. Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary E. Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary E. Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary E. Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary E. Reed. The network helps show where Mary E. Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary E. Reed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary E. Reed Line = papers co-authored together Mary E. Reed links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201951
2 202130
3 202323
4 201514
5 202210
6 202010
7 20219
8 20218
9 20186
10 20136
11 20236
12 20244
13 20253
14 20243
15 20252
16 20242
17
Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study
20212
18 20252
19 20241
20 20250

About Mary E. Reed

Mary E. Reed is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 28 papers that have together received 192 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (5 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (4 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (2 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (2 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (25 citations), Health Information Management (33 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations), Emergency Medicine (13 citations) and General Health Professions (32 citations). Mary E. Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Grenada. Frequent co-authors include Jie Huang, Dustin W. Ballard, Ilana Graetz, David R. Vinson, Dustin G. Mark, Romain Neugebauer, Richard W. Grant, John Hsu, Richard Brand and E. Margaret Warton. Their work appears in journals such as Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Journal of the American Heart Association, JAMA Network Open and Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact