Mary E. Desmond

1.2k total citations
31 papers, 895 citations indexed

About

Mary E. Desmond is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Developmental Neuroscience and Cell Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary E. Desmond has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 895 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Molecular Biology, 12 papers in Developmental Neuroscience and 6 papers in Cell Biology. Recurrent topics in Mary E. Desmond's work include Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (12 papers), Congenital heart defects research (10 papers) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (3 papers). Mary E. Desmond is often cited by papers focused on Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (12 papers), Congenital heart defects research (10 papers) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (3 papers). Mary E. Desmond collaborates with scholars based in United States, Spain and Germany. Mary E. Desmond's co-authors include Antone G. Jacobson, Gary C. Schoenwolf, Á. Gato, Clement Lo, Michael R. Kuehn, Janet L. Ewart, Ronan O’Rahilly, Andrew R. Haas, Rocky S. Tuan and J. Moro and has published in prestigious journals such as Development, The Journal of Comparative Neurology and Developmental Biology.

In The Last Decade

Mary E. Desmond

31 papers receiving 884 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary E. Desmond United States 18 518 242 205 196 168 31 895
Á. Gato Spain 22 663 1.3× 437 1.8× 171 0.8× 268 1.4× 214 1.3× 44 1.1k
Nathalie Coré France 19 1.1k 2.1× 203 0.8× 96 0.5× 201 1.0× 61 0.4× 28 1.4k
Tatsuya Sato Japan 16 720 1.4× 166 0.7× 89 0.4× 143 0.7× 68 0.4× 50 1.0k
Steven Lisgo United Kingdom 16 939 1.8× 139 0.6× 103 0.5× 148 0.8× 121 0.7× 26 1.4k
Marcelo F. Santiago Brazil 24 708 1.4× 304 1.3× 69 0.3× 422 2.2× 123 0.7× 53 1.4k
Scott May United States 10 797 1.5× 216 0.9× 153 0.7× 149 0.8× 67 0.4× 15 1.1k
Andrea György United States 14 681 1.3× 295 1.2× 68 0.3× 269 1.4× 69 0.4× 18 1.3k
Carolina Parada United States 21 890 1.7× 183 0.8× 104 0.5× 96 0.5× 84 0.5× 24 1.3k
Lucia Brown United States 13 822 1.6× 116 0.5× 115 0.6× 305 1.6× 207 1.2× 21 1.1k
Hiroki Ozaki Japan 17 302 0.6× 152 0.6× 114 0.6× 257 1.3× 126 0.8× 54 922

Countries citing papers authored by Mary E. Desmond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary E. Desmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary E. Desmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary E. Desmond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary E. Desmond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary E. Desmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary E. Desmond. The network helps show where Mary E. Desmond may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary E. Desmond

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary E. Desmond. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary E. Desmond based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary E. Desmond. Mary E. Desmond is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Desmond, Mary E., et al.. (2024). Preventing Community-Acquired Pressure Injury in Spinal Cord Injury: Simulation for Registered Nurses. Rehabilitation Nursing. 50(1). 3–11. 1 indexed citations
2.
González, Beverly, et al.. (2022). US Department of Veterans Affairs Post-Baccalaureate Registered Nurse Residency: Developing Nurses Equipped with Knowledge and Skills to Care for Nation’s Veterans. Nursing Clinics of North America. 57(3). 375–392. 3 indexed citations
3.
Carnicero, Estela, et al.. (2017). Embryonic Cerebrospinal Fluid Increases Neurogenic Activity in the Brain Ventricular-Subventricular Zone of Adult Mice. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy. 11. 124–124. 23 indexed citations
4.
Desmond, Mary E., et al.. (2014). Focal adhesion kinase as a mechanotransducer during rapid brain growth of the chick embryo. The International Journal of Developmental Biology. 58(1). 35–43. 17 indexed citations
5.
Gato, Á., M.I. Alonso, C. Martín, et al.. (2014). Embryonic cerebrospinal fluid in brain development: neural progenitor control. Croatian Medical Journal. 55(4). 299–305. 25 indexed citations
6.
Fabricius, Dorit, Bahri Karaçay, Damon C. Shutt, et al.. (2011). Characterization of Intestinal and Pancreatic Dysfunction in VPAC1-Null Mutant Mouse. Pancreas. 40(6). 861–871. 33 indexed citations
7.
Desmond, Mary E., et al.. (2009). Expansion of the Human Embryonic Brain During Rapid Growth: Area Analysis. The Anatomical Record. 292(4). 472–480. 9 indexed citations
8.
Gato, Á. & Mary E. Desmond. (2009). Why the embryo still matters: CSF and the neuroepithelium as interdependent regulators of embryonic brain growth, morphogenesis and histiogenesis. Developmental Biology. 327(2). 263–272. 74 indexed citations
9.
Meyer, Rita, et al.. (2005). Overexpression of connexin43 alters the mutant phenotype of midgestational wnt1 null mice resulting in recovery of the midbrain and cerebellum. The Anatomical Record Part A Discoveries in Molecular Cellular and Evolutionary Biology. 283A(1). 224–238. 10 indexed citations
10.
Desmond, Mary E., et al.. (2005). Internal luminal pressure during early chick embryonic brain growth: Descriptive and empirical observations. The Anatomical Record Part A Discoveries in Molecular Cellular and Evolutionary Biology. 285A(2). 737–747. 40 indexed citations
11.
Desmond, Mary E., et al.. (2003). Experimental Manipulation and Morphometric Analysis of Neural Tube Development. Humana Press eBooks. 136. 167–178. 3 indexed citations
12.
Desmond, Mary E., et al.. (2002). Brain expansion in the chick embryo initiated by experimentally produced occlusion of the spinal neurocoel. The Anatomical Record. 268(2). 147–159. 25 indexed citations
13.
Ewart, Janet L., et al.. (1998). No turning,a Mouse Mutation Causing Left–Right and Axial Patterning Defects. Developmental Biology. 193(1). 77–89. 81 indexed citations
15.
Desmond, Mary E., et al.. (1993). Second messenger regulation of occlusion of the spinal neurocoel in the chick embryo. Developmental Dynamics. 197(4). 291–306. 10 indexed citations
16.
Desmond, Mary E., et al.. (1992). Evaluation of neural fold fusion and coincident initiation of spinal cord occlusion in the chick embryo. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 319(2). 246–260. 11 indexed citations
17.
Desmond, Mary E., et al.. (1986). Identification of glycosaminoglycans in the chondrocranium of the chick embryo before and at the onset of chondrogenesis. Development. 93(1). 29–49. 8 indexed citations
18.
Desmond, Mary E.. (1982). Description of the occlusion of the spinal cord lumen in early human embryos. The Anatomical Record. 204(1). 89–93. 28 indexed citations
19.
Desmond, Mary E. & Ronan O’Rahilly. (1981). The growth of the human brain during the embryonic period proper. Anatomy and Embryology. 162(2). 137–151. 25 indexed citations
20.
Desmond, Mary E. & Antone G. Jacobson. (1977). Embryonic brain enlargement requires cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Developmental Biology. 57(1). 188–198. 192 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026