Mary Clyde Pierce

3.2k total citations
70 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Mary Clyde Pierce is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology and Emergency Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary Clyde Pierce has authored 70 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 48 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 35 papers in Clinical Psychology and 19 papers in Emergency Medicine. Recurrent topics in Mary Clyde Pierce's work include Child Abuse and Related Trauma (44 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (34 papers) and Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (14 papers). Mary Clyde Pierce is often cited by papers focused on Child Abuse and Related Trauma (44 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (34 papers) and Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (14 papers). Mary Clyde Pierce collaborates with scholars based in United States and Chile. Mary Clyde Pierce's co-authors include Rachel P. Berger, Gina Bertocci, Patrick M. Kochanek, Kim Kaczor, Raymond D. Pitetti, P. David Adelson, Douglas Lorenz, Sonia Singh, Stephen R. Wisniewski and Carole Jenny and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, PEDIATRICS and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Mary Clyde Pierce

62 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary Clyde Pierce United States 25 881 649 572 411 404 70 2.0k
Kenneth W. Feldman United States 25 1.4k 1.5× 827 1.3× 938 1.6× 132 0.3× 264 0.7× 110 2.4k
J R Sibert United Kingdom 27 1.0k 1.2× 772 1.2× 649 1.1× 127 0.3× 153 0.4× 88 2.6k
Anna Taylor United Kingdom 22 279 0.3× 407 0.6× 355 0.6× 609 1.5× 373 0.9× 61 2.1k
P M Sharples United Kingdom 14 323 0.4× 358 0.6× 202 0.4× 290 0.7× 186 0.5× 25 972
Monica Bennett United States 22 457 0.5× 257 0.4× 402 0.7× 97 0.2× 222 0.5× 125 1.9k
Jacqueline Collier United Kingdom 25 845 1.0× 73 0.1× 228 0.4× 173 0.4× 226 0.6× 52 1.9k
Isabelle Gagnon Canada 28 203 0.2× 1.2k 1.9× 265 0.5× 853 2.1× 2.0k 4.9× 136 2.8k
Jill Daugherty United States 16 250 0.3× 435 0.7× 145 0.3× 282 0.7× 583 1.4× 67 1.5k
Peter W. Forbes United States 24 305 0.3× 282 0.4× 190 0.3× 44 0.1× 298 0.7× 62 1.8k
Jennifer Ryan United Kingdom 23 590 0.7× 44 0.1× 473 0.8× 150 0.4× 283 0.7× 99 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Clyde Pierce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Clyde Pierce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Clyde Pierce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Clyde Pierce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Clyde Pierce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Clyde Pierce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Clyde Pierce. The network helps show where Mary Clyde Pierce may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Clyde Pierce

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Clyde Pierce. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Clyde Pierce based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Clyde Pierce. Mary Clyde Pierce is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pierce, Mary Clyde, et al.. (2025). Single Bruise Characteristics Associated With Abusive vs Accidental Injury. PEDIATRICS. 155(3).
2.
Pierce, Mary Clyde, Kim Kaczor, Douglas Lorenz, et al.. (2018). Are negative/unrealistic parent descriptors of infant attributes associated with physical abuse?. Child Abuse & Neglect. 80. 41–51. 13 indexed citations
3.
Lorenz, Douglas, Mary Clyde Pierce, Kim Kaczor, et al.. (2018). Classifying Injuries in Young Children as Abusive or Accidental: Reliability and Accuracy of an Expert Panel Approach. The Journal of Pediatrics. 198. 144–150.e4. 9 indexed citations
4.
Bertocci, Gina, Angela Thompson, & Mary Clyde Pierce. (2017). Femur fracture biomechanics and morphology associated with torsional and bending loading conditions in an in vitro immature porcine model. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 52. 5–11. 7 indexed citations
5.
Thompson, Richard, et al.. (2016). Is the Use of Physical Discipline Associated with Aggressive Behaviors in Young Children?. Academic Pediatrics. 17(1). 34–44. 11 indexed citations
6.
Pierce, Mary Clyde, Kim Kaczor, & Richard Thompson. (2014). Bringing Back the Social History. Pediatric Clinics of North America. 61(5). 889–905. 13 indexed citations
7.
Gossett, Jeffrey G., et al.. (2014). The FLUSH Study—Flush the Line and Ultrasound the Heart: Ultrasonographic Confirmation of Central Femoral Venous Line Placement. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 63(6). 678–683. 16 indexed citations
8.
Pierce, Mary Clyde, et al.. (2014). Factors Associated With Mode of Transport Decision Making for Pediatric-Neonatal Interfacility Transport. Air Medical Journal. 34(1). 44–51. 9 indexed citations
9.
Pierce, Mary Clyde, et al.. (2012). Identifying abusive head trauma. Contemporary pediatrics. 29(2). 16–24. 1 indexed citations
10.
Pierce, Mary Clyde & Carole Jenny. (2011). Child abuse and neglect : diagnosis, treatment and evidence. Elsevier eBooks. 24(7). 1867–78. 70 indexed citations
11.
Thompson, Angela, et al.. (2010). Pediatric short-distance household falls: Biomechanics and associated injury severity. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 43(1). 143–150. 33 indexed citations
12.
Berkenbosch, John W., et al.. (2009). Evaluation of Cerebral Oxygenation During Procedural Sedation in Children Using Near Infrared Spectroscopy. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 54(2). 205–213. 9 indexed citations
13.
Pierce, Mary Clyde, et al.. (2009). Bruising in Infants. Pediatric Emergency Care. 25(12). 845–847. 36 indexed citations
14.
Pierce, Mary Clyde, et al.. (2009). Bruising Characteristics Discriminating Physical Child Abuse From Accidental Trauma. PEDIATRICS. 125(1). 67–74. 171 indexed citations
15.
Pierce, Mary Clyde & Gina Bertocci. (2008). Injury Biomechanics and Child Abuse. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 10(1). 85–106. 20 indexed citations
16.
Pierce, Mary Clyde, et al.. (2004). Evaluating long bone fractures in children: a biomechanical approach with illustrative cases. Child Abuse & Neglect. 28(5). 505–524. 46 indexed citations
17.
Pitetti, Raymond D., Sonia Singh, & Mary Clyde Pierce. (2003). Safe and Efficacious Use of Procedural Sedation and Analgesia by Nonanesthesiologists in a Pediatric Emergency Department. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 157(11). 1090–1090. 164 indexed citations
18.
Bertocci, Gina, et al.. (2003). Using Test Dummy Experiments to Investigate Pediatric Injury Risk in Simulated Short-Distance Falls. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 157(5). 480–480. 43 indexed citations
19.
Isaacman, Daniel J., Michael P. Poirier, Amy L. Baxter, Kirsten Bechtel, & Mary Clyde Pierce. (2002). Abuse or not abuse: That is the question. Pediatric Emergency Care. 18(3). 203–208.
20.
Bertocci, Gina, et al.. (2001). Influence of accident environment on pediatric fall biomechanics using computer simulation: A means to investigate potential child abuse cases. 50. 861–862. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026