Mary C. Williams
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Statistics and Probability top 5%
- Co-authors
- Julie R. BrannanJames G. MayBruno G. BreitmeyerWilliam P. DunlapRobert S. KennedyNaomi WeissteinKevin W. GreveCarolina Gutiérrez‐Junquera
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (13 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers)Tactile and Sensory Interactions (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaFrance
In The Last Decade
Mary C. Williams
26 papers receiving 708 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Cognitive Neuroscience 544
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 251
- Social Psychology 143
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 134
- Statistics and Probability 133
Countries citing papers authored by Mary C. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary C. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary C. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary C. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary C. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary C. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary C. Williams. The network helps show where Mary C. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary C. Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary C. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary C. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary C. Williams. Mary C. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 37 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 37 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 84 | |
| 11 | 127 | |
| 12 | Perceptual consequences of a temporal processing deficit in reading disabled children. | 50 |
| 13 | 66 | |
| 14 | 34 | |
| 15 | Transfer of perceptual-motor training and the space adaptation syndrome. | 11 |
| 16 | Eye Movements as an Index of Mental Workload. | 1 |
| 17 | 42 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Mary C. Williams
Mary C. Williams is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Statistics and Probability, having authored 27 papers that have together received 768 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (13 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (544 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (251 citations) and Statistics and Probability (133 citations). Mary C. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include Julie R. Brannan, James G. May, Bruno G. Breitmeyer, William P. Dunlap, Robert S. Kennedy, Naomi Weisstein, Kevin W. Greve, Carolina Gutiérrez‐Junquera, William Lovegrove and Jill Brooks. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychologia, Vision Research and Brain and Language.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.