Mary C. Scholes

3.8k citations
90 papers · 2.7k indexed · h-index 29

Mary C. Scholes

88 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Mary C. Scholes
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Soil Science 621
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.2k
  • Atmospheric Science 734
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 493
  • Forestry 139
Replace Stefan Erasmi with:
Stefan Erasmi Germany
Seth M. Munson United States
Charles C. Rhoades United States
Kailiang Yu United States
Robert J. Zomer China
Tianxiang Luo China
Juntao Zhu China
Nicolas Vuichard France
Hua Ouyang China
Ensheng Weng United States
Mary C. Scholes relative to Stefan Erasmi Germany Stefan Erasmi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Stefan Erasmi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary C. Scholes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary C. Scholes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary C. Scholes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary C. Scholes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary C. Scholes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary C. Scholes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary C. Scholes. The network helps show where Mary C. Scholes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary C. Scholes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary C. Scholes Line = papers co-authored together Mary C. Scholes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20241
3 20241
4 20223
5 20223
6 20224
7 20209
8
Climate Change: Briefings from Southern Africa
20155
9 20111
10 20103
11 20097
12
Biological processes as indicators of sustainable plantation forestry : evidence for sustainable plantation forestry
20021
13
Some effects of the cultivation of pine on the chemistry of ultramafic soils
20014
14
Biogenic, biomass and biofuel sources of trace gases in southern Africa.
200111
15 200084
16
Environmental effects of mining coastal dunes: conjectures and refutations
199830
17 199816
18 19978
19 1996149
20
The effects of fire frequency on the organic components of a basaltic soil in the Kruger National Park.
199019

About Mary C. Scholes

Mary C. Scholes is a scholar working on Soil Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Forestry, having authored 90 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (19 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (18 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (13 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (10 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (10 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (9 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (9 papers) and Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (621 citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.2k citations) and Atmospheric Science (734 citations). Mary C. Scholes has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Scholes, L. Otter, C. C. Grant, Meinrat O. Andreae, D.A.B. Parsons, H. Puxbaum, Sandra Lavorel, Mike Flannigan, Éric F. Lambin and Andreas Limbeck. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Chemical Geology and Atmospheric Environment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026