Mary Bliss

1.1k total citations
39 papers, 614 citations indexed

About

Mary Bliss is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Surgery and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary Bliss has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 614 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Occupational Therapy, 8 papers in Surgery and 4 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Mary Bliss's work include Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (13 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (5 papers) and Wound Healing and Treatments (3 papers). Mary Bliss is often cited by papers focused on Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (13 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (5 papers) and Wound Healing and Treatments (3 papers). Mary Bliss collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Mary Bliss's co-authors include A. N. Exton‐Smith, Jane Thomas, Richard M. Terek, Paul Drury, Justin Greisberg, J. M. Thomas, Henrik Gutte, R.H. Bull, Michael M. Aziz and David L. Scott and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases and Osteoarthritis and Cartilage.

In The Last Decade

Mary Bliss

35 papers receiving 535 citations

Peers

Mary Bliss
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Occupational Therapy 329
  • Surgery 212
  • Rehabilitation 200
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 110
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 97
Replace Mary D. Litchford with:
Mary D. Litchford United States
Margaret Ellis United Kingdom
Asmara Jammali‐Blasi Australia
Elaine Friedberg Canada
Andrea Fisher Canada
Paulette Niewczyk United States
Ching‐Hui Hsieh United States
Margaret A. DiVita United States
Jenny Alderden United States
Kirsty Taylor Canada
Mary D. Litchford United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Mary Bliss
Mary Bliss · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Mary Bliss
Mary Bliss · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Bliss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Bliss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Bliss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Bliss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Bliss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Bliss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Bliss. The network helps show where Mary Bliss may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Bliss

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Bliss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Bliss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Bliss. Mary Bliss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 7
2 11
3 62
4 1
5 1
6 1
7 1
8 26
9 1
10 13
11 14
12 31
13 1
14
Resources, the family and voluntary euthanasia.
4
15 8
16 2
17
Exploring Attitudes toward Women with Disabilities: A Curriculum Guide for Employers and Educators.
2
18
Rationalizing outpatient prescribing.
1
19 5
20 11

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026