Martine Lemaire‐Chamley
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Plant Science top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Cell Biology
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Christophe RothanJohann PetitMyroslawa Miginiac‐MaslowFabien MounetEmmanuelle Issakidis‐BourguetAnnick MoingVéronique GermainCatherine Deborde
- Topics
- Plant Molecular Biology Research (13 papers)Plant Gene Expression Analysis (7 papers)Plant Reproductive Biology (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceJapanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Martine Lemaire‐Chamley
42 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Molecular Biology 1.1k
- Plant Science 947
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 294
- Cell Biology 98
- Pharmacology 95
Countries citing papers authored by Martine Lemaire‐Chamley
This map shows the geographic impact of Martine Lemaire‐Chamley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martine Lemaire‐Chamley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martine Lemaire‐Chamley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Martine Lemaire‐Chamley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martine Lemaire‐Chamley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martine Lemaire‐Chamley. The network helps show where Martine Lemaire‐Chamley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Martine Lemaire‐Chamley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Martine Lemaire‐Chamley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Martine Lemaire‐Chamley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Martine Lemaire‐Chamley. Martine Lemaire‐Chamley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | 73 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 52 | |
| 12 | 52 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | Isolation and Characterization of a Fruit Specific cDNA Clone for Vacuolar Processing Enzyme from Tomato (Accession No. AJ243876). (PGR99-164). | 3 |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 128 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 57 |
About Martine Lemaire‐Chamley
Martine Lemaire‐Chamley is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Plant Science and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Molecular Biology Research (13 papers), Plant Gene Expression Analysis (7 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (947 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (294 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.1k citations). Martine Lemaire‐Chamley has collaborated with scholars based in France, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christophe Rothan, Johann Petit, Myroslawa Miginiac‐Maslow, Fabien Mounet, Emmanuelle Issakidis‐Bourguet, Annick Moing, Véronique Germain, Catherine Deborde, Georg Andrees Böhme and Paulette Decottignies. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.