O. Piot

1.1k citations
24 papers · 754 indexed · h-index 14

O. Piot

23 papers receiving 704 citations

Peers

O. Piot
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 469
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 82
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 57
  • Sensory Systems 35
  • Physiology 187
Replace Mark D. Black with:
Mark D. Black United States
Philippe Pichat France
Carol J. Grossman United Kingdom
Akira Horita United States
J.M. Stutzmann France
Jun’ichi Semba Japan
Robert A. McArthur Italy
Dinah Weissmann France
Marc L. Zeise Chile
C M Fattaccini France
O. Piot relative to Mark D. Black United States Mark D. Black's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Mark D. Black · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by O. Piot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of O. Piot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by O. Piot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites O. Piot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by O. Piot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by O. Piot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by O. Piot. The network helps show where O. Piot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside O. Piot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with O. Piot Line = papers co-authored together O. Piot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 199513
2 199528
3 199415
4 199449
5 19947
6 19941
7 199425
8 199322
9
Pharmacological properties and mechanism of action of the cyclopyrrolones.
199311
10 19937
11 1993294
12 199257
13 199238
14 19921
15 199139
16 199131
17 199165
18 19911
19 199017
20 19904

About O. Piot

O. Piot is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Biological Psychiatry, Developmental Neuroscience and Physiology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 754 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (12 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (9 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (5 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (4 papers), Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response (2 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (469 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (82 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (57 citations), Sensory Systems (35 citations) and Physiology (187 citations). O. Piot has collaborated with scholars based in France and Italy. Frequent co-authors include J.C. Blanchard, Georg Andrees Böhme, Adam Doble, J.M. Stutzmann, M. Reibaud, Corentin Bon, Jean‐Charles Blanchard, Jean Rataud, B.P. Roques and Martine Lemaire‐Chamley. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Neuropharmacology, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, British Journal of Pharmacology and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026