Martine Fledderus
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions 11
- COVID-19 and Mental Health 5
- Applied Psychology top 1%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 4
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 9
- Mental Health Research Topics 4
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction 4
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
-
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 2
-
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout 1
- Co-authors
- Ernst T. BohlmeijerPeter M. ten KloosterM.M. VeehofRuth A. BaerMarcel E. PieterseKarlein M. G. SchreursGerben J. WesterhofHester R. Trompetter
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Martine Fledderus
16 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Clinical Psychology 1.5k
- Applied Psychology 365
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 760
- Social Psychology 569
- Psychiatry and Mental health 190
Countries citing papers authored by Martine Fledderus
This map shows the geographic impact of Martine Fledderus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martine Fledderus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martine Fledderus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Martine Fledderus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martine Fledderus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martine Fledderus. The network helps show where Martine Fledderus may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Martine Fledderus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 99 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 96 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 59 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 140 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 147 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 95 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 156 | |
| 12 | Psychometric Properties of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Depressed Adults and Development of a Short Formbreakdown → | 2011 | 746 |
| 13 | 2010 | 172 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 143 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 88 | |
| 16 | Acceptance and commitment therapy for public mental health promotion. Effectiveness of the ?living to the full? programme | 2009 | 1 |
About Martine Fledderus
Martine Fledderus is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (11 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (5 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.5k citations), Applied Psychology (365 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (760 citations). Martine Fledderus has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ernst T. Bohlmeijer, Peter M. ten Klooster, M.M. Veehof, Ruth A. Baer, Marcel E. Pieterse, Karlein M. G. Schreurs, Gerben J. Westerhof, Hester R. Trompetter, S.M.A. Lamers and Martijn A. H. Oude Voshaar.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.