Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Why did my car just do that? Explaining semi-autonomous driving actions to improve driver understanding, trust, and performance
2014328 citationsMartin Steinert, Larry Leifer et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Martin Steinert
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Martin Steinert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martin Steinert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martin Steinert more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martin Steinert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martin Steinert. The network helps show where Martin Steinert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Martin Steinert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Martin Steinert.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Martin Steinert based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Martin Steinert. Martin Steinert is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Balters, Stephanie, et al.. (2016). Introducing the wayfaring approach for the development of human experiments in interaction design and engineering design science. 1751–1762.3 indexed citations
14.
Steinert, Martin, et al.. (2016). USING SECONDARY VIDEO MATERIAL FOR USER OBSERVATION IN THE NEEDFINDING PROCESS FOR NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN. 1845–1854.4 indexed citations
15.
Steinert, Martin & Larry Leifer. (2012). ‘Finding one’s way’: Re-discovering a hunter-gatherer model based on wayfaring. International journal of engineering education. 28(2). 251–252.37 indexed citations
16.
Currano, Rebecca & Martin Steinert. (2012). A Framework for Reflective Practice in Innovative Design. International journal of engineering education. 28(2). 270–274.3 indexed citations
17.
Agrawal, Vikesh, et al.. (2012). CONCEPTUAL AND PRACTICAL USER INTEGRATION INTO THE DESIGN PROCESS - A FOUR STEP STAKEHOLDER APPROACH. 705–716.1 indexed citations
18.
Steinert, Martin, et al.. (2012). APPLYING BIOINFORMATICS ANALYSIS PRINCIPLES TO CAD DATA TO BETTER CHARACTERIZE AND IMPROVE THE ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS. 1049–1060.1 indexed citations
19.
Sanders, Elizabeth, et al.. (2012). Participatory Design with Marginalized People in Developing Countries: Challenges and Opportunities Experienced in a Field Study in Cambodia. 6(2).96 indexed citations
20.
Steinert, Martin & Larry Leifer. (2010). Scrutinizing Gartner's hype cycle approach. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. 1–13.24 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.