Countries citing papers authored by Markus Schroer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Markus Schroer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Markus Schroer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Markus Schroer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Markus Schroer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Markus Schroer. The network helps show where Markus Schroer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Markus Schroer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Markus Schroer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Markus Schroer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Markus Schroer. Markus Schroer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Schroer, Markus, et al.. (2015). Die Praxis des Verräumlichens: eine soziologische Perspektive. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 9–22.5 indexed citations
Kneer, Georg, Markus Schroer, Erhard Schüttpelz, & Bruno Latour. (2008). Bruno Latours Kollektive : Kontroversen zur Entgrenzung des Sozialen. Suhrkamp eBooks.15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.