Markus Hiebel

500 total citations
11 papers, 359 citations indexed

About

Markus Hiebel is a scholar working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Pollution and Control and Systems Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Markus Hiebel has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 359 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 2 papers in Pollution and 2 papers in Control and Systems Engineering. Recurrent topics in Markus Hiebel's work include Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (4 papers), Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (2 papers) and Catalysts for Methane Reforming (2 papers). Markus Hiebel is often cited by papers focused on Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (4 papers), Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (2 papers) and Catalysts for Methane Reforming (2 papers). Markus Hiebel collaborates with scholars based in Germany and Portugal. Markus Hiebel's co-authors include Daniel Maga, Nils Thonemann, Venkat Aryan, Tiago F. Lopes, César Fonseca, Francisco Gı́rio, Hans‐Joachim Gehrmann, Franz‐Georg Simon, Jan Blömer and Z Wu and has published in prestigious journals such as Resources Conservation and Recycling, Sustainability and The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

In The Last Decade

Markus Hiebel

11 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Markus Hiebel Germany 6 137 122 117 82 76 11 359
Mercedes Hortal Romania 14 143 1.0× 241 2.0× 118 1.0× 80 1.0× 91 1.2× 17 516
Unchalee Suwanmanee Thailand 9 228 1.7× 222 1.8× 148 1.3× 58 0.7× 59 0.8× 25 484
Stefan Albrecht Germany 4 145 1.1× 163 1.3× 84 0.7× 46 0.6× 102 1.3× 6 385
Zhi Kai Chong Germany 9 192 1.4× 129 1.1× 144 1.2× 113 1.4× 47 0.6× 14 488
Francesco Razza Italy 8 111 0.8× 110 0.9× 80 0.7× 40 0.5× 68 0.9× 13 295
Jörg Woidasky Germany 10 121 0.9× 46 0.4× 192 1.6× 34 0.4× 92 1.2× 28 390
A.I. Cavaco Morão Portugal 6 76 0.6× 111 0.9× 45 0.4× 124 1.5× 36 0.5× 7 313
Nahid Imtiaz Masuk Bangladesh 5 243 1.8× 107 0.9× 197 1.7× 65 0.8× 22 0.3× 7 468
Vincent Rossi Switzerland 5 145 1.1× 90 0.7× 144 1.2× 26 0.3× 111 1.5× 5 445

Countries citing papers authored by Markus Hiebel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Markus Hiebel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Markus Hiebel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Markus Hiebel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Markus Hiebel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Markus Hiebel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Markus Hiebel. The network helps show where Markus Hiebel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Markus Hiebel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Markus Hiebel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Markus Hiebel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Markus Hiebel. Markus Hiebel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Blömer, Jan, et al.. (2024). Assessment of Chemical Products and Processes: Green Metrics and Life Cycle Assessment – A Comparison. Chemie Ingenieur Technik. 96(5). 561–574. 8 indexed citations
2.
Maga, Daniel, et al.. (2024). How to Measure the Greenness of Chemicals? A Case Study on Butadiene Production Applying Green Metrics and Life Cycle Assessment. Chemie Ingenieur Technik. 96(5). 688–697. 2 indexed citations
3.
Thonemann, Nils, et al.. (2019). Location Planning for the Production of CO2‐Based Chemicals Using the Example of Olefin Production. Chemical Engineering & Technology. 43(3). 502–513. 3 indexed citations
4.
Maga, Daniel, Markus Hiebel, & Nils Thonemann. (2019). Life cycle assessment of recycling options for polylactic acid. Resources Conservation and Recycling. 149. 86–96. 147 indexed citations
5.
Maga, Daniel, Markus Hiebel, & Venkat Aryan. (2019). A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Meat Trays Made of Various Packaging Materials. Sustainability. 11(19). 5324–5324. 76 indexed citations
6.
Thonemann, Nils, et al.. (2019). Standortplanung für die Herstellung CO2‐basierter Chemikalien am Beispiel der Olefinproduktion. Chemie Ingenieur Technik. 91(9). 1238–1250. 5 indexed citations
7.
Maga, Daniel, Nils Thonemann, Markus Hiebel, et al.. (2018). Comparative life cycle assessment of first- and second-generation ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 24(2). 266–280. 71 indexed citations
8.
Gehrmann, Hans‐Joachim, Markus Hiebel, & Franz‐Georg Simon. (2017). Methods for the Evaluation of Waste Treatment Processes. Journal of Engineering. 2017. 1–13. 20 indexed citations
9.
Simon, Franz‐Georg & Markus Hiebel. (2014). Assessment of Waste Treatment Options: The New VDI Guideline 3925 for Decision Support. Chemie Ingenieur Technik. 86(11). 1954–1964. 1 indexed citations
10.
Maga, Daniel, et al.. (2012). Comparison of two ICT solutions: desktop PC versus thin client computing. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 18(4). 861–871. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026