G. Deerberg

36 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers

G. Deerberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Environmental Chemistry 104
  • Catalysis 44
  • Environmental Engineering 66
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 13
  • Plant Science 131
Replace Victor Pozzobon with:
Victor Pozzobon France
André Bellin Mariano Brazil
Kari Skjånes Norway
Marius Roman Romania
Huan Du China
A. Chhetri Canada
Wenhao Han China
Mohd Asyraf Kassim Malaysia
Xiangyang Lin China
Chen Taiwan
G. Deerberg relative to Victor Pozzobon France Victor Pozzobon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Victor Pozzobon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Deerberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Deerberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Deerberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Deerberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Deerberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Deerberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Deerberg. The network helps show where G. Deerberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Deerberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Deerberg Line = papers co-authored together G. Deerberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020138
2 201867
3 201138
4 200925
5 202024
6 202321
7 201119
8 201415
9 201713
10 201713
11 202012
12 20159
13 20106
14 19996
15 20186
16 20195
17 20105
18 20174
19 20193
20 19963

About G. Deerberg

G. Deerberg is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Environmental Chemistry, Control and Systems Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 39 papers that have together received 457 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (7 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (6 papers), CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (5 papers), Catalysts for Methane Reforming (5 papers), Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (4 papers), Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production (3 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (3 papers) and Fault Detection and Control Systems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Chemistry (104 citations), Catalysis (44 citations), Environmental Engineering (66 citations), Energy Engineering and Power Technology (13 citations) and Plant Science (131 citations). G. Deerberg has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Robert Schlögl, Stefan Schlüter, Eckhard Weidner, Miri Park, Wiebke Lüke, S. Schlüter, Joachim Neumann, Klaus Wallmann, Karlheinz Bretz and Judith M. Schicks. Their work appears in journals such as Chemie Ingenieur Technik, Chemical Engineering & Technology, Horticulture Research, Journal of Biotechnology and Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact