Markus Gilles

17 papers receiving 354 citations

Peers

Markus Gilles
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Reproductive Medicine 82
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 240
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 67
  • Genetics 138
  • Molecular Biology 165
Replace Manami URAKAWA with:
Manami URAKAWA Japan
Paula Ripamonte Brazil
Lynne C. O’Shea Ireland
Sara Scantland Canada
Ulas Cinar Germany
Omran Algriany Netherlands
Shorgan Bou China
S. Jacek Rzucidlo United States
M. Woźna Poland
M. Jackowska Poland
Markus Gilles relative to Manami URAKAWA Japan Manami URAKAWA's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Manami URAKAWA · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Markus Gilles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Markus Gilles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Markus Gilles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Markus Gilles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Markus Gilles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Markus Gilles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Markus Gilles. The network helps show where Markus Gilles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Markus Gilles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Markus Gilles Line = papers co-authored together Markus Gilles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 200453
2 200742
3 200538
4 200632
5 200729
6 200422
7 200621
8 200319
9 200618
10 200617
11 200516
12 200515
13 200614
14 200812
15 20218
16 20032
17 20041
18 20041
19 20040

About Markus Gilles

Markus Gilles is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics, Reproductive Medicine, Molecular Biology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (11 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (10 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (3 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (2 papers) and Sperm and Testicular Function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (82 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (240 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (67 citations), Genetics (138 citations) and Molecular Biology (165 citations). Markus Gilles has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include K. Schellander, Dawit Tesfaye, Klaus Wimmers, Siriluck Ponsuksili, Danyel G. J. Jennen, Ernst Tholen, F. Rings, Michael Hölker, Michael Hoelker and Korakot Nganvongpanit. Their work appears in journals such as Reproduction Fertility and Development, Reproduction in Domestic Animals, Theriogenology, Chemistry - A European Journal and Gene Expression.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact