Markku Lonkila
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Communication top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Education
- Demography
- Co-authors
- Veikko ErantiRisto AlapuroEeva LuhtakallioTerhi‐Anna WilskaTuomas Ylä‐AnttilaJussi Silvonen
- Topics
- Social Media and Politics (8 papers)Media Studies and Communication (4 papers)Social Capital and Networks (3 papers)
In The Last Decade
Markku Lonkila
21 papers receiving 261 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Sociology and Political Science 197
- Communication 81
- Political Science and International Relations 61
- Education 47
- Demography 19
Countries citing papers authored by Markku Lonkila
This map shows the geographic impact of Markku Lonkila's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Markku Lonkila with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Markku Lonkila more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Markku Lonkila
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Markku Lonkila. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Markku Lonkila. The network helps show where Markku Lonkila may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Markku Lonkila
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Markku Lonkila. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Markku Lonkila based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Markku Lonkila. Markku Lonkila is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | Social media in civic and political activism in Russia | 1 |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 44 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | Yhteisyyden kieliopit helsinkiläisessä ja pietarilaisessa kaupunkiaktivismissa | 4 |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | Social networks and civic culture in Estonia and North-western Russia | 3 |
| 16 | Laadullinen tekstianalyysi ATLAS.ti 4.2. -ohjelmalla | 2 |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | Social networks in post-Soviet Russia | 9 |
| 19 | 43 | |
| 20 | Grounded theory as an emerging paradigm for computer-assisted qualitative data analysis | 60 |
About Markku Lonkila
Markku Lonkila is a scholar working on Communication, Urban Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (8 papers), Media Studies and Communication (4 papers) and Social Capital and Networks (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (81 citations), Sociology and Political Science (197 citations) and Urban Studies (18 citations). Markku Lonkila has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, China and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Veikko Eranti, Risto Alapuro, Eeva Luhtakallio, Terhi‐Anna Wilska, Tuomas Ylä‐Anttila and Jussi Silvonen. Their work appears in journals such as New Media & Society, First Monday and Journal of Youth Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.