Mark Wright
Impact in
- Biophysics top 1%
- Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
-
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research 3
-
- Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research 7
- Co-authors
- Nicholas Stone (8 shared papers)Paul Crow (7 shared papers)Jeremy Uff (3 shared papers)John A. Farmer (2 shared papers)Catherine Kendall (6 shared papers)Hugh Barr (1 shared paper)Raj Persad (4 shared papers)Alan M. Johnson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of Urology (4 papers)The American Surgeon (1 paper)Health Technology Assessment (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Mark Wright
27 papers receiving 635 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Biophysics 298
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 82
- Analytical Chemistry 215
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 141
- Insect Science 48
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Wright. The network helps show where Mark Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 154 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 101 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 90 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 37 | |
| 6 | 1970 | 34 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 20 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2001 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2002 | 4 |
About Mark Wright
Mark Wright is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biophysics, Surgery, Analytical Chemistry and Epidemiology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 653 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (7 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (6 papers), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (3 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (3 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (3 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (2 papers), Hernia repair and management (2 papers) and Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (298 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (82 citations), Analytical Chemistry (215 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (141 citations) and Insect Science (48 citations). Mark Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas Stone, Paul Crow, Jeremy Uff, John A. Farmer, Catherine Kendall, Hugh Barr, Raj Persad, Alan M. Johnson, I. K. R. McMillan and Dorota Juszczyk. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Urology, The American Surgeon, Health Technology Assessment, BMJ Open and npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.