Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast Cancer
20091.6k citationsMaggie C.U. Cheang, Stephen Chia et al.JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Instituteprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Watson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Watson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Watson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Watson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Watson. The network helps show where Mark Watson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Watson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Watson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Watson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Watson. Mark Watson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bimrose, Jenny, Mary McMahon, & Mark Watson. (2015). Women's career development through the lifespan: an international perspective. Routledge eBooks.2 indexed citations
7.
McMahon, Mary, Mark Watson, & Jenny Bimrose. (2013). Older women's careers : systemic perspectives. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 5. 119–133.1 indexed citations
McMahon, Mary & Mark Watson. (2013). Story telling: crafting identities. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling. 41(3). 277–286.29 indexed citations
10.
McMahon, Mary, et al.. (2012). Story telling, career assessment and careercounselling. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 26(1). 729–741.5 indexed citations
11.
Watson, Mark & Mary McMahon. (2012). Career development : global issues and challenges. Nova Science Publishers eBooks.15 indexed citations
Cheang, Maggie C.U., Stephen Chia, David Voduc, et al.. (2009). Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast Cancer. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 101(10). 736–750.1641 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Watson, Mark, et al.. (2008). Creating Place: Design Education as Vocational Education and Training.. National Centre for Vocational Education Research.
Watson, Mark & Mary McMahon. (2005). Postmodern (narrative) career counselling and education. Perspectives in Education. 23(2). 1–126.16 indexed citations
19.
Watson, Mark, et al.. (2005). Postmodern Career Counselling, Theory and Training: Ethical Considerations.. Perspectives in Education. 23(2). 29–37.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.