Mark van Overveld

1.0k total citations
17 papers, 529 citations indexed

About

Mark van Overveld is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark van Overveld has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 529 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 8 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 6 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Mark van Overveld's work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (14 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers). Mark van Overveld is often cited by papers focused on Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (14 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers). Mark van Overveld collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Austria and United Kingdom. Mark van Overveld's co-authors include Peter J. de Jong, Madelon L. Peters, Charmaine Borg, E.G. Schouten, Willibrord Weijmar Schultz, Wiljo J.P.J. van Hout, Theo Bouman, Jacques van Lankveld, Iris M. Engelhard and Reinhilde Melles and has published in prestigious journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, Personality and Individual Differences and Biological Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Mark van Overveld

16 papers receiving 517 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark van Overveld Netherlands 12 363 209 209 157 126 17 529
Bieke David United States 11 430 1.2× 257 1.2× 159 0.8× 149 0.9× 58 0.5× 12 544
Mingyue Xiao China 13 134 0.4× 119 0.6× 122 0.6× 166 1.1× 30 0.2× 46 374
Shivali Sarawgi United States 7 167 0.5× 63 0.3× 172 0.8× 171 1.1× 20 0.2× 15 321
Chris J. Burgin United States 11 131 0.4× 90 0.4× 175 0.8× 106 0.7× 68 0.5× 19 380
Ralph Grabhorn Germany 14 112 0.3× 94 0.4× 180 0.9× 502 3.2× 142 1.1× 33 648
Lizet Ketelaar Netherlands 12 275 0.8× 108 0.5× 73 0.3× 178 1.1× 41 0.3× 16 608
Marc Schipper Germany 7 168 0.5× 55 0.3× 63 0.3× 109 0.7× 37 0.3× 17 332
Sarah A. Lust United States 13 276 0.8× 58 0.3× 121 0.6× 62 0.4× 48 0.4× 15 493
Gary D. Poole Canada 8 124 0.3× 117 0.6× 78 0.4× 41 0.3× 62 0.5× 11 336
Elise C. Bennik Netherlands 10 88 0.2× 66 0.3× 149 0.7× 195 1.2× 44 0.3× 16 344

Countries citing papers authored by Mark van Overveld

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark van Overveld's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark van Overveld with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark van Overveld more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark van Overveld

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark van Overveld. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark van Overveld. The network helps show where Mark van Overveld may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark van Overveld

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark van Overveld. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark van Overveld based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark van Overveld. Mark van Overveld is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Overveld, Mark van. (2017). What to Expect from Sex? Contamination and Harm relevant UCS-Expectancy Bias in Individuals with High and Low Sexual Complaints.. 1(3).
2.
Overveld, Mark van. (2016). Emotion regulation can be costly. A study on the effects of emotion regulation strategies on impulsive purchases in consumers. Innovative Marketing. 12(1). 41–49. 2 indexed citations
3.
Overveld, Mark van & Charmaine Borg. (2014). Brief Emotion Regulation Training Facilitates Arousal Control During Sexual Stimuli. The Journal of Sex Research. 52(9). 996–1005. 8 indexed citations
4.
Jong, Peter J. de, et al.. (2014). Disgust and Sexual Arousal in Young Adult Men and Women. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 44(6). 1515–1525. 21 indexed citations
5.
Jong, Peter J. de, Mark van Overveld, & Charmaine Borg. (2013). Giving In to Arousal or Staying Stuck in Disgust? Disgust-Based Mechanisms in Sex and Sexual Dysfunction. The Journal of Sex Research. 50(3-4). 247–262. 72 indexed citations
6.
Höller, Yvonne, et al.. (2013). Nausea in Specific Phobia of Vomiting. Behavioral Sciences. 3(3). 445–458. 12 indexed citations
7.
Overveld, Mark van, Peter J. de Jong, Madelon L. Peters, et al.. (2012). The Sexual Disgust Questionnaire; a Psychometric Study and a First Exploration in Patients with Sexual Dysfunctions. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 10(2). 396–407. 27 indexed citations
8.
Jong, Peter J. de, Mark van Overveld, & Madelon L. Peters. (2011). Sympathetic and parasympathetic responses to a core disgust video clip as a function of disgust propensity and disgust sensitivity. Biological Psychology. 88(2-3). 174–179. 45 indexed citations
9.
Overveld, Mark van, Peter J. de Jong, Madelon L. Peters, & E.G. Schouten. (2011). The Disgust Scale-R: A valid and reliable index to investigate separate disgust domains?. Personality and Individual Differences. 51(3). 325–330. 73 indexed citations
10.
Overveld, Mark van, Peter J. de Jong, Jorg Huijding, & Madelon L. Peters. (2010). Contamination and harm relevant UCS‐expectancy bias in spider phobic individuals: influence of treatment. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 17(6). 510–518. 6 indexed citations
11.
Overveld, Mark van, Peter J. de Jong, & Madelon L. Peters. (2010). The Multi-Dimensional Blood/Injury Phobia Inventory: Its psychometric properties and relationship with disgust propensity and disgust sensitivity. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 25(3). 319–325. 13 indexed citations
12.
Overveld, Mark van, Peter J. de Jong, & Madelon L. Peters. (2010). The Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale – Revised: Its predictive value for avoidance behavior. Personality and Individual Differences. 49(7). 706–711. 78 indexed citations
13.
Overveld, Mark van, Peter J. de Jong, & Madelon L. Peters. (2009). Disgust and fear‐related UCS‐expectancy bias in blood‐fearful individuals. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 17(2). 100–109. 6 indexed citations
14.
Engelhard, Iris M., et al.. (2009). Expectancy bias and the persistence of posttraumatic stress. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 47(10). 887–892. 26 indexed citations
15.
Overveld, Mark van, Peter J. de Jong, Madelon L. Peters, Wiljo J.P.J. van Hout, & Theo Bouman. (2007). An internet-based study on the relation between disgust sensitivity and emetophobia. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 22(3). 524–531. 52 indexed citations
16.
Jong, Peter J. de, et al.. (2007). Disgust and Contamination Sensitivity in Vaginismus and Dyspareunia. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 38(2). 244–252. 55 indexed citations
17.
Overveld, Mark van, Peter J. de Jong, & Madelon L. Peters. (2005). Differential UCS expectancy bias in spider fearful individuals: Evidence toward an association between spiders and disgust-relevant outcomes. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 37(1). 60–72. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bieke David Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mingyue Xiao Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Shivali Sarawgi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Chris J. Burgin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ralph Grabhorn Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lizet Ketelaar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marc Schipper Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sarah A. Lust Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gary D. Poole Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elise C. Bennik
Rankless by CCL
2026