Jacques van Lankveld

5.2k total citations
131 papers, 3.6k citations indexed

About

Jacques van Lankveld is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jacques van Lankveld has authored 131 papers receiving a total of 3.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 75 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 64 papers in Clinical Psychology and 39 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jacques van Lankveld's work include Sexual function and dysfunction studies (72 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (55 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (22 papers). Jacques van Lankveld is often cited by papers focused on Sexual function and dysfunction studies (72 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (55 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (22 papers). Jacques van Lankveld collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United States. Jacques van Lankveld's co-authors include Moniek M. ter Kuile, Rosemary Basson, Lori A. Brotto, Willibrord Weijmar Schultz, Reinhilde Melles, Julia R. Heiman, Sandra R. Leiblum, Jean L. Fourcroy, Ellen Laan and Leonard R. Derogatis and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Jacques van Lankveld

118 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jacques van Lankveld Netherlands 34 2.3k 1.3k 634 577 574 131 3.6k
Paul Enzlin Belgium 36 1.7k 0.8× 727 0.6× 621 1.0× 446 0.8× 462 0.8× 120 3.5k
Alessandra H. Rellini United States 31 1.6k 0.7× 1.6k 1.2× 676 1.1× 297 0.5× 376 0.7× 54 2.9k
Kevan Wylie United Kingdom 32 2.3k 1.0× 1.6k 1.2× 1.4k 2.2× 396 0.7× 772 1.3× 163 4.7k
Natalie O. Rosen Canada 36 2.3k 1.0× 1.2k 0.9× 1.2k 1.9× 480 0.8× 784 1.4× 171 3.6k
Beverly Whipple United States 31 2.1k 0.9× 756 0.6× 582 0.9× 675 1.2× 384 0.7× 74 3.5k
Pedro Nobre Portugal 34 2.6k 1.1× 2.2k 1.6× 721 1.1× 271 0.5× 844 1.5× 173 3.6k
Marta Meana United States 30 1.4k 0.6× 886 0.7× 392 0.6× 393 0.7× 448 0.8× 69 3.0k
Caroline F. Pukall Canada 39 3.1k 1.4× 974 0.7× 560 0.9× 1.3k 2.3× 369 0.6× 169 4.7k
Samir Khalifé Canada 40 2.7k 1.2× 926 0.7× 357 0.6× 1.3k 2.2× 341 0.6× 75 4.2k
Moniek M. ter Kuile Netherlands 37 1.6k 0.7× 599 0.5× 245 0.4× 561 1.0× 348 0.6× 86 3.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Jacques van Lankveld

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jacques van Lankveld's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacques van Lankveld with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacques van Lankveld more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jacques van Lankveld

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacques van Lankveld. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacques van Lankveld. The network helps show where Jacques van Lankveld may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jacques van Lankveld

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jacques van Lankveld. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jacques van Lankveld based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jacques van Lankveld. Jacques van Lankveld is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
3.
Pat‐El, Ron, et al.. (2024). Beyond Difference Scores: Unlocking Insights with Polynomial Regression in Studies on the Effects of Implicit-Explicit Congruency. Psychologica Belgica. 64(1). 5–23. 2 indexed citations
4.
Verboon, Peter, et al.. (2024). Initial development and validation of item banks to measure problematic hypersexuality. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 129–129. 1 indexed citations
5.
Waterink, Wim, et al.. (2023). Measuring the psychological burden of women with pelvic floor complaints: The psychometric characteristics of a new instrument. Open Research Europe. 3. 83–83. 3 indexed citations
6.
Bos, Arjan E. R., et al.. (2023). Ego depletion and implicit and explicit determinants of condom use intentions: an experimental study among young men. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 11–11. 1 indexed citations
7.
Lankveld, Jacques van, et al.. (2023). The associations of sexual desire, daily stress, and intimacy in gay men in long-term relationships. International Journal of Impotence Research. 36(3). 248–255.
8.
Quinta-Gomes, Ana Luísa, Ruslan Leontjevas, Jacques van Lankveld, & Pedro Nobre. (2023). Psychometric Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Sexual Self-Consciousness Scale (SSCS). Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 50(1). 55–62. 1 indexed citations
9.
Verboon, Peter, et al.. (2023). Initial development and validation of item banks to measure problematic hypersexuality. Open Research Europe. 3. 129–129. 1 indexed citations
10.
Oudsten, Brenda L. Den, et al.. (2023). Emotionally focused couple therapy in cancer survivor couples with marital and sexual problems: a replicated single-case experimental design. Frontiers in Psychology. 14. 1123821–1123821. 3 indexed citations
11.
Jongen, Ellen M.M., et al.. (2022). Loneliness in patients with somatic symptom disorder. Scandinavian Journal of Pain. 23(2). 291–297. 5 indexed citations
12.
Verboon, Peter, et al.. (2022). The Relation of Mood and Sexual Desire: An Experience Sampling Perspective on the Dual Control Model. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 51(8). 3871–3886. 4 indexed citations
13.
Verboon, Peter, et al.. (2021). Associations between Fluctuating Shame, Self-Esteem, and Sexual Desire: Comparing Frequent Porn Users and a General Population Sample. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). 1–19. 4 indexed citations
14.
Meerkerk, Gert‐Jan, et al.. (2019). Het seksverslavingsmodel van hyperseksualiteit getoetst : essentiële kenmerken en hun samenhang met hulpbehoefte. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 43(4). 845. 1 indexed citations
15.
Lankveld, Jacques van, Peter Leusink, & Gjalt-Jorn Peters. (2016). Therapie-monitoring in een blended online en face-to-face behandeling van een jonge man met situatieve erectieproblemen. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 41(1). 15–22. 1 indexed citations
16.
Lankveld, Jacques van, et al.. (2016). Wat is er veranderd sinds Masters en Johnson?: Ontwikkelingen in de seksuologische hulpverlening. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 40(3). 140–147. 1 indexed citations
17.
Lankveld, Jacques van, et al.. (2012). Richtlijn 'Vroegtijdige zaadlozing'. Nederlandsch tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/NTvG-databank. 156(41). 48–57.
18.
Lankveld, Jacques van, et al.. (2009). Internet-Based Brief Sex Therapy for Heterosexual Men with Sexual Dysfunctions: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 6(8). 2224–2236. 57 indexed citations
19.
Lankveld, Jacques van. (2009). Self-Help Therapies for Sexual Dysfunction. The Journal of Sex Research. 46(2-3). 143–155. 24 indexed citations
20.
Schultz, Willibrord Weijmar, Rosemary Basson, Yitzchak M. Binik, et al.. (2005). Women's Sexual Pain and its Management. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2(3). 301–316. 146 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026