Eva Knop

8.0k total citations · 3 hit papers
89 papers, 4.4k citations indexed

About

Eva Knop is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Eva Knop has authored 89 papers receiving a total of 4.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 29 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 19 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Eva Knop's work include Plant and animal studies (34 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (29 papers) and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (18 papers). Eva Knop is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (34 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (29 papers) and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (18 papers). Eva Knop collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Netherlands. Eva Knop's co-authors include David Kleijn, Félix Herzog, Jort Verhulst, Nadja Knop, Yann Clough, Andrea Holzschuh, Mario Dı́az, E. J. P. Marshall, Doreen Gabriel and Teja Tscharntke and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Nature Communications and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Eva Knop

82 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Hit Papers

Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri‐environment schemes i... 2006 2026 2012 2019 2006 2008 2017 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Eva Knop Switzerland 33 1.8k 1.5k 1.3k 1.1k 883 89 4.4k
Tord Snäll Sweden 33 1.6k 0.9× 1.5k 1.0× 1.5k 1.1× 852 0.8× 1.3k 1.4× 102 4.1k
Julian Reid Australia 17 1.4k 0.8× 2.4k 1.5× 1.3k 1.0× 2.7k 2.5× 730 0.8× 30 6.1k
Christopher J. Whelan United States 37 2.1k 1.2× 2.2k 1.4× 989 0.7× 2.8k 2.6× 666 0.8× 125 5.5k
Göran Englund Sweden 33 1.4k 0.8× 2.0k 1.3× 957 0.7× 2.6k 2.4× 368 0.4× 84 4.4k
Yvonne M. Buckley Australia 41 1.9k 1.1× 2.7k 1.7× 1.0k 0.8× 1.8k 1.7× 1.6k 1.9× 120 5.4k
Mary M. Gardiner United States 31 1.8k 1.0× 786 0.5× 731 0.6× 581 0.5× 1.3k 1.5× 75 3.8k
Ross N. Cuthbert United Kingdom 33 556 0.3× 1.1k 0.7× 708 0.5× 2.1k 2.0× 364 0.4× 237 4.0k
Nancy E. McIntyre United States 27 792 0.4× 961 0.6× 1.2k 0.9× 1.5k 1.4× 446 0.5× 93 3.4k
Rhett D. Harrison China 37 1.9k 1.0× 1.5k 1.0× 841 0.6× 1.3k 1.2× 1.4k 1.6× 116 4.4k
Dietmar Moser Austria 36 1.7k 1.0× 2.1k 1.3× 908 0.7× 1.4k 1.3× 1.1k 1.2× 116 4.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Knop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Knop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Knop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Knop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Knop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Knop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Knop. The network helps show where Eva Knop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eva Knop

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eva Knop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eva Knop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eva Knop. Eva Knop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Knop, Eva & Davide M. Dominoni. (2024). Sensory pollution by artificial light: Implications for ecology and evolution. Basic and Applied Ecology. 78. 39–40. 1 indexed citations
2.
Martínez‐Núñez, Carlos, Martin M. Goßner, Felix Neff, et al.. (2024). Land‐use change in the past 40 years explains shifts in arthropod community traits. Journal of Animal Ecology. 93(5). 540–553. 6 indexed citations
3.
Knop, Eva, et al.. (2023). Patterns of high-flying insect abundance are shaped by landscape type and abiotic conditions. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 15114–15114. 12 indexed citations
4.
Liu, Yanjie, et al.. (2022). The Matthew effect: Common species become more common and rare ones become more rare in response to artificial light at night. Global Change Biology. 28(11). 3674–3682. 24 indexed citations
5.
Xu, Xin, Zong‐Xin Ren, Judith Trunschke, et al.. (2021). Bimodal activity of diurnal flower visitation at high elevation. Ecology and Evolution. 11(19). 13487–13500. 18 indexed citations
6.
Schuster, G.M., et al.. (2020). Artificial light at night can modify ecosystem functioning beyond the lit area. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 11870–11870. 41 indexed citations
7.
Zemanova, Miriam A., Olivier Broennimann, Antoine Guisan, Eva Knop, & Gerald Heckel. (2018). Slimy invasion: Climatic niche and current and future biogeography of Arion slug invaders. Diversity and Distributions. 24(11). 1627–1640. 25 indexed citations
8.
Knop, Eva, et al.. (2018). Contrasting responses in community structure and phenology of migratory and non‐migratory pollinators to urbanization. Diversity and Distributions. 24(7). 919–927. 31 indexed citations
9.
Sanders, Dirk, et al.. (2014). Individual and species‐specific traits explain niche size and functional role in spiders as generalist predators. Journal of Animal Ecology. 84(1). 134–142. 62 indexed citations
10.
Nickel, Herbert, et al.. (2013). Penestragania apicalis (Osborn & Ball, 1898), another invasive Nearctic leafhopper found in Europe: (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae, Iassinae). 13. 5–15. 3 indexed citations
11.
Boch, Steffen, Markus Fischer, Eva Knop, et al.. (2012). Fern and bryophyte endozoochory by slugs. Oecologia. 172(3). 817–822. 44 indexed citations
12.
Knop, Eva, et al.. (2010). Keratinization of the Human Meibomian Gland and Its Contribution to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (mgd). Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 51(13). 2366–2366. 1 indexed citations
13.
Knop, Eva & Nadja Knop. (2009). Keratinisation and Muco-Cutaneous Junction of the human Lid Margin in Relation to the Meibomian Gland Orifice. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(13). 4833–4833. 7 indexed citations
14.
Knop, Nadja & Eva Knop. (2009). Meibom-Drüsen. Der Ophthalmologe. 106(10). 872–883. 62 indexed citations
15.
Knop, Eva, Nadja Knop, H. Brewitt, et al.. (2009). Meibom-Drüsen. Der Ophthalmologe. 106(11). 966–979. 35 indexed citations
16.
Knop, Eva, Nadja Knop, Robert Kraak, et al.. (2008). Definition of Different Subzones, Including the Lid Wiper, in the Marginal Human Conjunctiva by Histology and in vivo Confocal Microscopy. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(13). 5299–5299. 5 indexed citations
17.
Knop, Eva & Nadja Knop. (2005). Lymphoid Follicles in Conjunctiva–Associated Lymphoid Tissue (Calt) of the Rabbit Reveal Ultrastructural Characteristics of M–Cells. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 46(13). 2688–2688. 1 indexed citations
18.
Knop, Eva & Nadja Knop. (2004). The normal human Eye–Associated Lymphoid Tissue (EALT) regularly produces an accessory molecule (J–chain) of the secretory immune system. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 1483–1483. 1 indexed citations
20.
Bader, A., Eva Knop, Klaus H.W. Böker, et al.. (1996). Tacrolimus (FK 506) biotransformation in primary rat hepatocytes depends on extracellular matrix geometry. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology. 353(4). 461–473. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026