Mark Tushnet
Impact in
- Law top 0.5%
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies
- Comparative and International Law Studies
- Brazilian Legal Issues
-
- International Law and Human Rights
- European and International Law Studies
- Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
Papers in
- Law 9
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies 9
- Legal and Policy Issues 1
-
- European and International Law Studies 4
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 2
- International Law and Aviation 1
- Legal Systems and Judicial Processes 1
- Co-authors
- Sujit ChoudhryLorraine WeinribJeffrey GoldsworthyBrenda CossmanOren GrossRan HirschlNeil WalkerJean-François Gaudreault-DesBiens
- Journals
- The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (1 paper)The Yale Law Journal (1 paper)Michigan Law Review (1 paper)Osgoode Hall law journal (1 paper)Cambridge University Press eBooks (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark Tushnet
9 papers receiving 217 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Law 183
- Political Science and International Relations 180
- Sociology and Political Science 103
- Strategy and Management 20
- History 12
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Tushnet
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Tushnet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Tushnet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Tushnet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Tushnet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Tushnet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Tushnet. The network helps show where Mark Tushnet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Mark Tushnet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Institutions Supporting Constitutional Democracy: Some Thoughts About Anti-Corruption (and Other) Agencies | 2019 | 6 |
| 2 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 112 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 36 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 21 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 71 |
About Mark Tushnet
Mark Tushnet is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 278 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (9 papers), European and International Law Studies (4 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), International Law and Aviation (1 paper), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (1 paper), Legal and Policy Issues (1 paper) and Corruption and Economic Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (183 citations), Political Science and International Relations (180 citations), Sociology and Political Science (103 citations), Strategy and Management (20 citations) and History (12 citations). Mark Tushnet has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sujit Choudhry, Lorraine Weinrib, Jeffrey Goldsworthy, Brenda Cossman, Oren Gross, Ran Hirschl, Neil Walker, Jean-François Gaudreault-DesBiens, Michel Rosenfeld and Mattias Kumm. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, The Yale Law Journal, Michigan Law Review, Osgoode Hall law journal and Cambridge University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.