Mark Stowell

664 total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 403 citations indexed

About

Mark Stowell is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Computational Mechanics. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Stowell has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 403 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 9 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 5 papers in Computational Mechanics. Recurrent topics in Mark Stowell's work include Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (12 papers), Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (8 papers) and Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (5 papers). Mark Stowell is often cited by papers focused on Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (12 papers), Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (8 papers) and Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (5 papers). Mark Stowell collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Netherlands. Mark Stowell's co-authors include D. White, Tzanio Kolev, Jean‐Sylvain Camier, Julian Andrej, Yohann Dudouit, Vladimir Tomov, Veselin Dobrev, Will Pazner, Aaron Fisher and Stefano Zampini and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques and Computer Physics Communications.

In The Last Decade

Mark Stowell

16 papers receiving 390 citations

Hit Papers

MFEM: A modular finite element methods library 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Stowell United States 7 149 128 76 64 63 17 403
Aaron Fisher United States 9 170 1.1× 193 1.5× 61 0.8× 85 1.3× 33 0.5× 36 495
Vladimir Tomov United States 10 355 2.4× 82 0.6× 85 1.1× 55 0.9× 52 0.8× 24 544
Johann Dahm United States 8 156 1.0× 70 0.5× 64 0.8× 41 0.6× 45 0.7× 12 367
Jakub Červený United States 5 244 1.6× 143 1.1× 78 1.0× 59 0.9× 36 0.6× 6 458
Jean‐Sylvain Camier United States 7 213 1.4× 79 0.6× 96 1.3× 53 0.8× 33 0.5× 11 392
Jamie Bramwell United States 4 181 1.2× 88 0.7× 81 1.1× 43 0.7× 28 0.4× 4 334
Julian Andrej United States 5 142 1.0× 68 0.5× 65 0.9× 44 0.7× 29 0.5× 7 309
Yohann Dudouit United States 4 140 0.9× 67 0.5× 68 0.9× 45 0.7× 29 0.5× 5 298
Andrew T. Barker United States 8 295 2.0× 90 0.7× 129 1.7× 53 0.8× 32 0.5× 19 485
Misun Min United States 15 308 2.1× 134 1.0× 50 0.7× 119 1.9× 140 2.2× 42 636

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Stowell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Stowell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Stowell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Stowell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Stowell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Stowell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Stowell. The network helps show where Mark Stowell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Stowell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Stowell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Stowell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Stowell. Mark Stowell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Andrej, Julian, Jean‐Sylvain Camier, Veselin Dobrev, et al.. (2024). High-performance finite elements with MFEM. The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications. 8 indexed citations
2.
Wright, J. C., et al.. (2023). Using the Stix finite element RF code to investigate operation optimization of the ICRF antenna on Alcator C-Mod. Nuclear Fusion. 63(10). 106006–106006. 2 indexed citations
3.
Stowell, Mark, et al.. (2023). Development of impedance sheath boundary condition in Stix finite element RF code. AIP conference proceedings. 2984. 60004–60004. 2 indexed citations
4.
Green, David L., Xiaozhe Hu, J. Lore, Lin Mu, & Mark Stowell. (2023). An Efficient High-Order Solver for Diffusion Equations with Strong Anisotropy on Non-Anisotropy-Aligned Meshes. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. 46(2). S199–S222. 2 indexed citations
5.
Green, David L., Xiaozhe Hu, J. Lore, Lin Mu, & Mark Stowell. (2022). An efficient high-order numerical solver for diffusion equations with strong anisotropy. Computer Physics Communications. 276. 108333–108333. 10 indexed citations
6.
Langer, S. H., et al.. (2021). Performance Analysis and Optimization for BLAST, a High Order Finite Element Hydro Code. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).
7.
Anderson, Robert, Julian Andrej, Andrew T. Barker, et al.. (2020). MFEM: A modular finite element methods library. Computers & Mathematics with Applications. 81. 42–74. 273 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
White, D., Mark Stowell, & Daniel A. Tortorelli. (2018). Toplogical optimization of structures using Fourier representations. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. 58(3). 1205–1220. 20 indexed citations
9.
Shiraiwa, S., J. C. Wright, P. T. Bonoli, Tzanio Kolev, & Mark Stowell. (2017). RF wave simulation for cold edge plasmas using the MFEM library. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 157. 3048–3048. 32 indexed citations
10.
Schaffner, James H., Kevin Geary, D. Yap, et al.. (2010). High power microwave pulse impact on an all-dielectric lithium niobate modulator. 4. 78–81. 3 indexed citations
11.
Stowell, Mark & D. White. (2008). Discretizing Transient Current Densities in the Maxwell Equations. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 2 indexed citations
12.
Stowell, Mark, et al.. (2008). Investigation of Radar Propagation in Buildings: A 10-Billion Element Cartesian-Mesh FETD Simulation. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation. 56(8). 2241–2250. 15 indexed citations
13.
Stowell, Mark, et al.. (2008). Investigation of radar propagation in buildings: A 10 billion element Cartesian-mesh FETD simulation. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 5. 1–4. 2 indexed citations
14.
White, D., et al.. (2007). A QR Accelerated Volume-to-Surface Boundary Condition for the Finite-Element Solution of Eddy-Current Problems. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 43(5). 1920–1933. 2 indexed citations
15.
White, D., Mark Stowell, Robert N. Rieben, et al.. (2006). A Hybrid FEM-BEM Unified Boundary Condition with Sub-Cycling for Electromagnetic Radiation. 2006 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. 2757–2760. 1 indexed citations
16.
Jandhyala, Vikram, et al.. (2005). A Generalized TDIE Framework for Arbitrary Time Basis Functions. 3B. 443–446. 1 indexed citations
17.
White, D. & Mark Stowell. (2004). Full-Wave Simulation of Electromagnetic Coupling Effects in RF and Mixed-Signal ICs Using a Time-Domain Finite-Element Method. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques. 52(5). 1404–1413. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026