Mark Steiner

23 papers receiving 718 citations

Peers

Mark Steiner
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Theoretical Computer Science 70
  • History and Philosophy of Science 284
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 180
  • Philosophy 121
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 91
Replace Ronald W. Clark with:
Ronald W. Clark United States
Décio Krause Brazil
Frederik Müller Netherlands
Øystein Linnebo Norway
Maria Reichenbach United States
María Carla Galavotti Italy
Joel David Hamkins United States
Jon Dorling United Kingdom
Vladimir Kanovei Russia
Colin McLarty United States
Mark Steiner relative to Ronald W. Clark United States Ronald W. Clark's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×23.3×
Ronald W. Clark · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Steiner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Steiner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Steiner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Steiner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Steiner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Steiner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Steiner. The network helps show where Mark Steiner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Steiner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Steiner Line = papers co-authored together Mark Steiner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1968148
2 1998137
3 1978134
4 197856
5 200050
6 200044
7 199939
8 196939
9 199231
10 198929
11 199119
12 199619
13 199515
14 197314
15 198310
16 19968
17 20006
18 19865
19 19754
20 19783

About Mark Steiner

Mark Steiner is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Religious studies, having authored 24 papers that have together received 816 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (3 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (2 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (2 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (2 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (1 paper) and Lipid metabolism and disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (70 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (284 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (180 citations), Philosophy (121 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (91 citations). Mark Steiner has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Gray Sj, Melba Hernandez, Patricia A. Detmers, Michael Detlefsen, Dooseop Kim, Carl P. Sparrow, Samuel D. Wright, Arthur A. Patchett, Meng‐Hsin Chen and Yu‐Sheng Chao. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Philosophy, American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters and Noûs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026