Mark Schwab
About
In The Last Decade
Mark Schwab
8 papers receiving 447 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 278
- Materials Chemistry 115
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 103
- Condensed Matter Physics 65
- Automotive Engineering 62
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Schwab
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Schwab's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Schwab with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Schwab more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Schwab
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Schwab. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Schwab. The network helps show where Mark Schwab may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Schwab
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Schwab. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Schwab based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Schwab. Mark Schwab is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 145 | |
| 2 | 48 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 53 | |
| 5 | 37 | |
| 6 | 72 | |
| 7 | 56 | |
| 8 | 23 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.