Mark Saeger
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal and Optic Conditions
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
-
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis
- Retinal and Macular Surgery
Papers in
-
- Retinal and Optic Conditions 7
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 7
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 4
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 3
-
- Corneal surgery and disorders 3
- Retinal and Macular Surgery 3
- Co-authors
- Johann RoiderRalf BrinkmannBernhard NölleReginald BirngruberStefan KoinzerFelix TreumerFlorian RüferAmke Caliebe
- Journals
- BMC Ophthalmology (2 papers)Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (2 papers)Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (2 papers)British Journal of Ophthalmology (1 paper)Journal of Glaucoma (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark Saeger
12 papers receiving 196 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
- Ophthalmology 194
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 113
- Biomedical Engineering 42
- Molecular Biology 56
- Neurology 4
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Saeger
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Saeger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Saeger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Saeger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Saeger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Saeger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Saeger. The network helps show where Mark Saeger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Mark Saeger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 28 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 58 | |
| 12 | Automatic Dosimetry Control for Gentle Retinal Photocoagulation | 2009 | 1 |
| 13 | 2008 | 26 |
About Mark Saeger
Mark Saeger is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Neurology and Molecular Biology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 206 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal and Optic Conditions (7 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (4 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (3 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (3 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (3 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (194 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (113 citations), Biomedical Engineering (42 citations), Molecular Biology (56 citations) and Neurology (4 citations). Mark Saeger has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Johann Roider, Ralf Brinkmann, Bernhard Nölle, Reginald Birngruber, Stefan Koinzer, Felix Treumer, Florian Rüfer, Amke Caliebe, J. Roider and Elfriede Fritzer. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, British Journal of Ophthalmology and Journal of Glaucoma.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.