Mark Robson
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Computer Networks and Communications top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy top 10%
- Information Systems
- Co-authors
- Emin Gün SirerSharad GoelMilo PolteMarquard SmithPeter StockwellJames LoxleyPaul S. SeaverKelly McGuire
- Topics
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (5 papers)Critical Theory and Political Philosophy (5 papers)Theology and Philosophy of Evil (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark Robson
23 papers receiving 179 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Artificial Intelligence 130
- Computer Networks and Communications 76
- Sociology and Political Science 39
- Philosophy 27
- Information Systems 25
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Robson
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Robson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Robson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Robson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Robson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Robson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Robson. The network helps show where Mark Robson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Robson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Robson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Robson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Robson. Mark Robson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | The history of suicide in England, 1650-1850 | 1 |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | Language in theory | 0 |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | Herbivore: A Scalable and Efficient Protocol for Anonymous Communication | 110 |
| 18 | Looking with Ears, Hearing with Eyes: Shakespeare and the Ear of the Early Modern | 2 |
| 19 | "Trying to Pick a Lock with a Wet Herring”: Hamlet, Film, and Spectres of Psychoanalysis | 0 |
| 20 | 2 |
About Mark Robson
Mark Robson is a scholar working on Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 37 papers that have together received 218 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (5 papers), Critical Theory and Political Philosophy (5 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (130 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (76 citations) and Philosophy (27 citations). Mark Robson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Emin Gün Sirer, Sharad Goel, Milo Polte, Marquard Smith, Peter Stockwell, James Loxley, Paul S. Seaver and Kelly McGuire. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Philosophy and Zygon®.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.