Countries citing papers authored by Laurence Danlos
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Laurence Danlos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurence Danlos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurence Danlos more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurence Danlos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurence Danlos. The network helps show where Laurence Danlos may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laurence Danlos
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laurence Danlos.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laurence Danlos based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Laurence Danlos. Laurence Danlos is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Danlos, Laurence, et al.. (2015). FDTB1: Repérage des connecteurs de discours en corpus. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 34–40.1 indexed citations
2.
Denis, Pascal, et al.. (2011). French TimeBank: An ISO-TimeML Annotated Reference Corpus. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 130–134.20 indexed citations
3.
Danlos, Laurence & Owen Rambow. (2011). Discourse Relations and Propositional Attitudes. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).4 indexed citations
4.
Danlos, Laurence, et al.. (2011). Traduction (automatique) des connecteurs de discours. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).8 indexed citations
5.
Seddah, Djamé, Benoît Sagot, & Laurence Danlos. (2010). Control Verb, Argument Cluster Coordination and Multi Component TAG. 101–110.
Danlos, Laurence. (2009). D-STAG: a discourse analysis formalism based on synchronous TAGs.. 50. 111–143.2 indexed citations
9.
Danlos, Laurence & Benoît Sagot. (2008). Constructions pronominales dans Dicovalence et le lexique-grammaire--intégration dans le Lefff. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).3 indexed citations
10.
Sagot, Benoît & Laurence Danlos. (2008). Améliorer un lexique syntaxique à l'aide des tables du lexique-grammaire Constructions impersonnelles et expressions verbales figées. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 5. 107–126.2 indexed citations
11.
Danlos, Laurence. (2006). Capacité générative forte de RST, SDRT et des DAG de dépendances pour le discours.. 47. 169–198.1 indexed citations
12.
Danlos, Laurence. (2005). ILIMP: Outil pour repérer les occurences du pronom impersonnel il. 121–130.5 indexed citations
13.
Danlos, Laurence, et al.. (2005). Coordination of Causal Relations in Discourse.. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 75–84.3 indexed citations
14.
Danlos, Laurence. (2004). Discourse Dependency Structures as Constrained DAGs. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 127–135.11 indexed citations
15.
Danlos, Laurence. (2004). Sentences with Two Subordinate Clauses: Syntactic and Semantic Analyses, Underspecified Semantic Representation. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 140–147.3 indexed citations
Meunier, Frédéric & Laurence Danlos. (1998). System Demonstration FLAUBERT: An User Friendly System for Multilingual Text Generation.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.