Mark Riley

2.2k citations
55 papers · 1.7k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Riley

54 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Mark Riley
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 275
  • Waste Management and Disposal 58
  • Geography, Planning and Development 45
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 48
  • Urban Studies 21
Replace Amita Baviskar with:
Amita Baviskar India
Steffanie Scott Canada
Anna Krzywoszynska United Kingdom
Richard Munton United Kingdom
Keshav Lall Maharjan Japan
Ian Bowler United Kingdom
Nathan McClintock United States
Arya Hadi Dharmawan Indonesia
Diana Stuart United States
Susanne Freidberg United States
Mark Riley relative to Amita Baviskar India Amita Baviskar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.5×
Amita Baviskar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Riley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Riley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Riley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Riley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Riley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Riley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Riley. The network helps show where Mark Riley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Riley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Riley Line = papers co-authored together Mark Riley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201496
2 201587
3 201485
4 201379
5 201778
6 201975
7 200774
8 200771
9 201070
10 201365
11 201260
12 201059
13 200949
14 201649
15 201744
16 201842
17 202139
18 200536
19 200936
20 200533

About Mark Riley

Mark Riley is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Geography, Planning and Development, Waste Management and Disposal, History and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rural development and sustainability (5 papers), Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis (4 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (4 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (4 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers), Urban and spatial planning (2 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (2 papers) and Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (275 citations), Waste Management and Disposal (58 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (45 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (48 citations) and Urban Studies (21 citations). Mark Riley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Mark Holton, David Harvey, Madeleine Gustavsson, Terry Louis Tudor, Guy Martin Robinson, Stewart W. Barr, Rob J.F. Burton, Hugh G. Smith, Heather Sangster and Richard C. Chiverrell. Their work appears in journals such as Land Use Policy, Journal of Rural Studies, Social & Cultural Geography, Area and Geography Compass.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact