Mark Reardon
- Surgery top 5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Emergency Medicine top 2%
- Neurology top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ian G. StiellGary H. GreenbergMary A. EisenhauerGeorge A. WellsJames WorthingtonIain MacPhailR.Douglas McKnightRobert J. Brison
- Topics
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (7 papers)Thermoregulation and physiological responses (4 papers)Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaIrelandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark Reardon
23 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Surgery 566
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 300
- Emergency Medicine 247
- Neurology 239
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 202
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Reardon
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Reardon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Reardon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Reardon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Reardon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Reardon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Reardon. The network helps show where Mark Reardon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Reardon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Reardon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Reardon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Reardon. Mark Reardon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 36 | |
| 4 | 39 | |
| 5 | 47 | |
| 6 | 71 | |
| 7 | 386 | |
| 8 | 119 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 57 | |
| 13 | 57 | |
| 14 | 84 | |
| 15 | The Brain. Navigating the New Reality: An Exploration of Brain-Compatible Learning. | 2 |
| 16 | Variation in emergency department use of cervical spine radiography for alert, stable trauma patients. | 45 |
| 17 | 106 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Mark Reardon
Mark Reardon is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (7 papers), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (4 papers) and Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (247 citations), Family Practice (37 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (300 citations). Mark Reardon has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ian G. Stiell, Gary H. Greenberg, Mary A. Eisenhauer, George A. Wells, James Worthington, Iain MacPhail, R.Douglas McKnight, Robert J. Brison, Catherine M. Clement and Jonathan Dreyer. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Applied Physiology and CHEST Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.