Mark Prescott
Impact in
- Physiology top 2%
- Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling
- Parasitology top 5%
- Parasites and Host Interactions
Papers in
- Aging 3
-
- Parasites and Host Interactions 5
- Co-authors
- Alexander G. McLennanHuw H. ReesL. John GoadRichard P. EvershedRoy M. DanielDeborah WardPeter M. BrophyE. James LaCourse
- Journals
- Biochemical Society Transactions (5 papers)Journal of Mass Spectrometry (5 papers)Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry (3 papers)Nucleic Acids Research (3 papers)Biochemical Journal (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNew ZealandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark Prescott
62 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Physiology 123
- Parasitology 145
- Small Animals 131
- Aging 16
- Insect Science 98
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Prescott
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Prescott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Prescott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Prescott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Prescott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Prescott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Prescott. The network helps show where Mark Prescott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Prescott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 19 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 27 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 39 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 64 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 30 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 73 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 45 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 42 | |
| 17 | 1992 | 14 | |
| 18 | 1990 | 21 | |
| 19 | 1989 | 45 | |
| 20 | 1989 | 6 |
About Mark Prescott
Mark Prescott is a scholar working on Aging, Parasitology, Spectroscopy, Small Animals and Molecular Biology, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (7 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (7 papers), Helminth infection and control (6 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (5 papers), Biochemical and Structural Characterization (5 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (4 papers) and Coccidia and coccidiosis research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (123 citations), Parasitology (145 citations), Small Animals (131 citations), Aging (16 citations) and Insect Science (98 citations). Mark Prescott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alexander G. McLennan, Huw H. Rees, L. John Goad, Richard P. Evershed, Roy M. Daniel, Deborah Ward, Peter M. Brophy, E. James LaCourse, Geoffrey Wainwright and Neil Spooner. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Society Transactions, Journal of Mass Spectrometry, Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, Nucleic Acids Research and Biochemical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.