Mark Pohl
Impact in
-
- Genetic diversity and population structure
- Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
-
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
- Gene expression and cancer classification
Papers in
-
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 2
- Gene expression and cancer classification 1
-
- Intellectual Property and Patents 2
- Co-authors
- Michael T. Boyce-Jacino (4 shared papers)Trey Ideker (1 shared paper)Scott L. Taylor (1 shared paper)Deborah A. Nickerson (1 shared paper)Craig A. Gelfand (2 shared papers)Shobha Varde (2 shared papers)Ching‐Yu Huang (2 shared papers)Peter A. Bell (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMC Bioinformatics (1 paper)BioTechniques (1 paper)Genome Research (1 paper)Bioinformatics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaIndia
In The Last Decade
Mark Pohl
6 papers receiving 406 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Genetics 155
- Molecular Biology 217
- Horticulture 3
- Plant Science 86
- Aging 2
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Pohl
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Pohl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Pohl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Pohl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Pohl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Pohl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Pohl. The network helps show where Mark Pohl may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Mark Pohl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 254 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 149 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 5 | |
| 6 | How to Control the United States Pharmaceutical API Market Using Patents on New Synthetic Intermediate Compounds | 2008 | 2 |
| 7 | Patent Infringement by ANDA Filing | 2014 | 0 |
About Mark Pohl
Mark Pohl is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Management of Technology and Innovation, Genetics, Strategy and Management and Information Systems and Management, having authored 7 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Rare Diseases (2 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (2 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (2 papers), Biomedical and Engineering Education (1 paper), Scientific Computing and Data Management (1 paper), Gene expression and cancer classification (1 paper), International Arbitration and Investment Law (1 paper) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (155 citations), Molecular Biology (217 citations), Horticulture (3 citations), Plant Science (86 citations) and Aging (2 citations). Mark Pohl has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and India. Frequent co-authors include Michael T. Boyce-Jacino, Trey Ideker, Scott L. Taylor, Deborah A. Nickerson, Craig A. Gelfand, Shobha Varde, Ching‐Yu Huang, Peter A. Bell, Frank S. Modica and Renbin Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Bioinformatics, BioTechniques, Genome Research and Bioinformatics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.