Mark Paxton

682 citations
14 papers · 471 indexed · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Paxton

13 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers

Mark Paxton
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Human-Computer Interaction 227
  • Computer Science Applications 82
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 141
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 81
  • Transportation 42
Replace Konstantinos Papangelis with:
Konstantinos Papangelis China
Evangelos Niforatos Switzerland
Rob Anastasi United Kingdom
Ju Row-Farr United Kingdom
Sarah Gallacher United Kingdom
Leif Oppermann Germany
Rob Ingram United Kingdom
Hamed S. Alavi Switzerland
Abdul Nasir Zulkifli Malaysia
Esko Kurvinen Finland
Mark Paxton relative to Konstantinos Papangelis China Konstantinos Papangelis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Konstantinos Papangelis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Paxton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Paxton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Paxton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Paxton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Paxton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Paxton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Paxton. The network helps show where Mark Paxton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Paxton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Paxton Line = papers co-authored together Mark Paxton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2006268
2 200764
3 201141
4 200926
5 200520
6 200416
7 201311
8 20068
9 20116
10
Hazelwood's Effect on the Attitudes of Newspaper Advisers.
19973
11 19993
12 20083
13 20002
14 20080

About Mark Paxton

Mark Paxton is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Information Systems, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Education and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 471 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include ICT in Developing Communities (3 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (3 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (3 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (2 papers), Legal Issues in Education (2 papers), Law, Rights, and Freedoms (2 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (227 citations), Computer Science Applications (82 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (141 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (81 citations) and Transportation (42 citations). Mark Paxton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Steve Benford, Martin Flintham, Rob Anastasi, Matt Adams, Nick Tandavanitj, Adam Drozd, Andy Crabtree, Ju Row-Farr, Danaë Stanton Fraser and Alan Chamberlain. Their work appears in journals such as Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Journal of Media and Religion, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction and PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented Reality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact