Mark Oremus
-
- Aging and Gerontology Research 9
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 1%
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes 8
- Health top 1%
- Health disparities and outcomes 26
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 10
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 33
-
- Heart Failure Treatment and Management 13
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 39
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 10
- Co-authors
- Parminder RainaPasqualina SantaguidaChristina WolfsonAfisi IsmailaChristopher PattersonAnne PerraultLouise DemersCynthia Balion
- Journals
- Heart Failure Reviews (9 papers)Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (8 papers)Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Mark Oremus
140 papers receiving 4.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 188
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 102
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 248
- Health 446
- Psychiatry and Mental health 700
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 687
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Oremus
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Oremus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Oremus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Oremus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Oremus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Oremus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Oremus. The network helps show where Mark Oremus may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Oremus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 49 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 66 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 6 |
About Mark Oremus
Mark Oremus is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Health and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 147 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (39 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (33 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (26 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (13 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (10 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (10 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (9 papers) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (102 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (248 citations) and Health (446 citations). Mark Oremus has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Parminder Raina, Pasqualina Santaguida, Christina Wolfson, Afisi Ismaila, Christopher Patterson, Anne Perrault, Louise Demers, Cynthia Balion, Lynda Booker and Lauren E. Griffith. Their work appears in journals such as Heart Failure Reviews, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology and Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.