Mark O. Clements

39 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Mark O. Clements
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Endocrinology 179
  • Infectious Diseases 544
  • Biotechnology 199
  • Molecular Medicine 97
  • Microbiology 118
Replace Baolin Sun with:
Baolin Sun China
Benoît Marteyn France
Bruce J. Shenker United States
G.J. Russell-Jones Australia
Yang Shen China
Jinquan Li China
Jeffrey M. Boyd United States
David G. Klapper United States
Egon Amann Germany
Öjar Melefors Sweden
Mark O. Clements relative to Baolin Sun China Baolin Sun's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Baolin Sun · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark O. Clements

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark O. Clements's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark O. Clements with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark O. Clements more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark O. Clements

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark O. Clements. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark O. Clements. The network helps show where Mark O. Clements may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark O. Clements, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark O. Clements Line = papers co-authored together Mark O. Clements links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001282
2 2007202
3 2005171
4 1998170
5 1998167
6 1999144
7 2002143
8 1998117
9 1999103
10 2002101
11 200974
12 200668
13 200659
14 200358
15 200758
16 199947
17 200939
18 199337
19 199834
20 200630

About Mark O. Clements

Mark O. Clements is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Genetics, Food Science and Endocrinology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (9 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (9 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (6 papers), Vibrio bacteria research studies (4 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (4 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (4 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (3 papers) and Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (179 citations), Infectious Diseases (544 citations), Biotechnology (199 citations), Molecular Medicine (97 citations) and Microbiology (118 citations). Mark O. Clements has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Simon J. Foster, Steve P. Watson, Eileen Ingham, Anne Moir, Simon J. Foster, Malcolm J. Horsburgh, Christopher Mason, Mikael Rhen, Pan F. Chan and Richard O. C. Oreffo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, Tissue Engineering, Infection and Immunity, Microbiology and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact