Mark Nartey
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Communication top 10%
- Topics
- Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (16 papers)Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (7 papers)Social Media and Politics (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaMedia Culture & SocietySocial Media + Society
- Partner nations
- United KingdomHong KongGhana
In The Last Decade
Mark Nartey
30 papers receiving 274 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Literature and Literary Theory 109
- Sociology and Political Science 99
- Language and Linguistics 68
- Gender Studies 61
- Communication 59
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Nartey
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Nartey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Nartey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Nartey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Nartey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Nartey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Nartey. The network helps show where Mark Nartey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Nartey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Nartey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Nartey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Nartey. Mark Nartey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 50 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | A Semantic Investigation into the Use of Modal Auxiliary Verbs in the Manifesto of a Ghanaian Political Party | 14 |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | Cohesion in the abstracts of undergraduate dissertations: An Intra-disciplinary study in a Ghanaian University | 3 |
| 20 | A speech act analysis of status updates on facebook: the case of Ghanaian university students | 7 |
About Mark Nartey
Mark Nartey is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Linguistics and Language and Communication, having authored 36 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (16 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (7 papers) and Social Media and Politics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (109 citations), Communication (59 citations) and Linguistics and Language (32 citations). Mark Nartey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Yating Yu, Hans J. Ladegaard, Joseph Benjamin Archibald Afful, Jieyu Chen and Aditi Bhatia. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Media Culture & Society and Social Media + Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.