Mark Nadel

1.8k citations
24 papers · 458 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Nadel

21 papers receiving 408 citations

Peers

Mark Nadel
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Geometry and Topology 121
  • Cancer Research 131
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 142
  • Mathematical Physics 45
  • Theoretical Computer Science 4
Replace Fuzhou Gong with:
Fuzhou Gong China
Shuanping Du China
AM Arjeh Cohen United States
Zepeng Li China
Luis David García Puente United States
Jose C. Nacher Japan
Wolfgang M. Willems Germany
Matthew He United States
Giuseppe Pirillo Italy
Ying Yin China
Mark Nadel relative to Fuzhou Gong China Fuzhou Gong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Fuzhou Gong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Nadel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Nadel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Nadel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Nadel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Nadel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Nadel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Nadel. The network helps show where Mark Nadel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Mark Nadel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Nadel Line = papers co-authored together Mark Nadel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005229
2 197444
3
What Needs Securing.
198836
4 197828
5 197812
6 197812
7 198212
8 200612
9 197411
10 198210
11
Substitution and Refutation Revisited.
19919
12 19809
13 19775
14 19904
15 19814
16 19784
17 19724
18 19723
19 19803
20 19892

About Mark Nadel

Mark Nadel is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Artificial Intelligence, Mathematical Physics and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 24 papers that have together received 458 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Topology and Set Theory (9 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (6 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (3 papers), semigroups and automata theory (3 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (2 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (2 papers) and Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (121 citations), Cancer Research (131 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (142 citations), Mathematical Physics (45 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations). Mark Nadel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Jenny E. Rooke, John Harris, Michael Gallo, J.J. Garver, Maria Hackett, S. R. Gullans, Sonal A. Patel, Lori A. Neely, Stephen McLaughlin and Jonathan Stavi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Symbolic Logic, Israel Journal of Mathematics, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Nature Methods and Analytical Biochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact