Mark Limes

493 citations
21 papers · 357 indexed · h-index 10

Mark Limes

21 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers

Mark Limes
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 259
  • Biophysics 23
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 68
  • Polymers and Plastics 27
  • Spectroscopy 31
Replace Juho Luomahaara with:
Juho Luomahaara Finland
Chenglin Liu China
G. Bevilacqua Italy
Hrvoje Skenderović Croatia
Motohiro Suyama Japan
Jan Preusser United States
Ricardo Jiménez-Martínez United States
T. Koryu Ishii United States
C. Morrison United Kingdom
Mark Limes relative to Juho Luomahaara Finland Juho Luomahaara's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Juho Luomahaara · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Limes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Limes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Limes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Limes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Limes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Limes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Limes. The network helps show where Mark Limes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Limes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Limes Line = papers co-authored together Mark Limes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20253
2 20252
3 20241
4 202234
5 202121
6 202130
7
Total-field atomic gradiometer for unshielded portable magnetoencephalography
20203
8 201916
9 20193
10 2018106
11
A 3 He- 129 Xe co-magnetometer with 87 Rb magnetometry
20161
12 20164
13 201536
14 201533
15 20151
16
Numerical study of spin-dependent transition rates within pairs of dipolar and exchange coupled spins with (s=1/2) during magnetic resonant excitation
20132
17 201313
18 201314
19 20139
20 200623

About Mark Limes

Mark Limes is a scholar working on Biophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Polymers and Plastics and Radiation, having authored 21 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (13 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (9 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (4 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (3 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (3 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (3 papers) and Conducting polymers and applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (259 citations), Biophysics (23 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (68 citations), Polymers and Plastics (27 citations) and Spectroscopy (31 citations). Mark Limes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include M. V. Romalis, D. Sheng, T. W. Kornack, Christoph Boehme, Michael Romalis, E. L. Foley, Vito Giovanni Lucivero, B. Saam, Kipp J. van Schooten and John M. Lupton. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review B, Nature Communications, Physical review. A, Physical Review Applied and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026