Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Biological magnetic resonance imaging using laser-polarized 129Xe
1994819 citationsMitchell S. Albert, G. D. Cates et al.Natureprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of B. Saam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Saam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Saam more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Saam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Saam. The network helps show where B. Saam may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Saam
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Saam.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Saam based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with B. Saam. B. Saam is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gentile, T., Pierre-Jean Nacher, B. Saam, & Thad Walker. (2017). Optically polarizedHe3. Reviews of Modern Physics. 89(4).97 indexed citations
3.
Limes, Mark, Jinqi Wang, William Baker, et al.. (2013). Numerical study of spin-dependent transition rates within pairs of dipolar and exchange coupled spins with (s=1/2) during magnetic resonant excitation. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2013.2 indexed citations
Saam, B., et al.. (2009). Characterization of a Low Pressure, High Capacity $^{129}$Xe Flow-Through Polarizer. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 40.12 indexed citations
6.
Schrank, G., et al.. (2008). Gas-phase spin relaxation of 129 Xe. Physical Review A. 78.10 indexed citations
7.
Saam, B., et al.. (2007). Nuclear spin relaxation of $^{129}$Xe due to persistent xenon dimers. Bulletin of the American Physical Society.1 indexed citations
8.
Jacob, Richard E., et al.. (2007). Rapid Production of Hyperpolarized $^3$He Gas for MRI. Bulletin of the American Physical Society.
9.
Jacob, Richard E., et al.. (2003). Low-field orientation dependence of ^3He relaxation in spin-exchange cells. APS. 2003.1 indexed citations
Saam, B., Dmitriy A. Yablonskiy, David S. Gierada, & Mark S. Conradi. (1999). Rapid imaging of hyperpolarized gas using EPI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 42(3). 507–514.3 indexed citations
Saam, B.. (1995). Pulse-Nmr Studies of Spin Relaxation Relevant to Laser-Polarized Noble Gases.. PhDT.1 indexed citations
19.
Middleton, H., Robert D. Black, B. Saam, et al.. (1995). MR Imaging with Hyperpolarized 3He Gas. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 33(2). 271–275.290 indexed citations
20.
Albert, Mitchell S., G. D. Cates, Bastiaan Driehuys, et al.. (1994). Biological magnetic resonance imaging using laser-polarized 129Xe. Nature. 370(6486). 199–201.819 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.