Mark K. Schutze
- Insect Science top 0.5%
- Ecology top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Anthony R. ClarkeMatt N. KroschStephen L. CameronAndrew J. JessupG. C. GrahamKirsten D ScottCorinna L. LangePaul J. De Barro
- Topics
- Insect behavior and control techniques (38 papers)Forest Insect Ecology and Management (22 papers)Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (19 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesAustria
In The Last Decade
Mark K. Schutze
43 papers receiving 980 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Insect Science 877
- Ecology 298
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 286
- Plant Science 273
- Molecular Biology 260
Countries citing papers authored by Mark K. Schutze
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark K. Schutze's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark K. Schutze with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark K. Schutze more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark K. Schutze
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark K. Schutze. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark K. Schutze. The network helps show where Mark K. Schutze may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark K. Schutze
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark K. Schutze. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark K. Schutze based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark K. Schutze. Mark K. Schutze is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 55 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | Integrative taxonomy versus taxonomic authority without peer review: the case of the Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Tephritidae) | 2 |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | The mating system of the true fruit fly Bactrocera tryoni and its sister-species, Bactrocera neohumeralis | 1 |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 35 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 50 | |
| 16 | 78 | |
| 17 | 46 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Mark K. Schutze
Mark K. Schutze is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect behavior and control techniques (38 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (22 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (877 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (286 citations) and Ecology (298 citations). Mark K. Schutze has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Anthony R. Clarke, Matt N. Krosch, Stephen L. Cameron, Andrew J. Jessup, G. C. Graham, Kirsten D Scott, Corinna L. Lange, Paul J. De Barro, Anna Englezou and Toni A. Chapman. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.