Mark J. Sarsfield
- Inorganic Chemistry top 0.5%
- Radioactive element chemistry and processing 61
- Synthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds 6
-
- Chemical Synthesis and Characterization 26
- Organic Chemistry top 2%
- Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis 15
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Nuclear Materials and Properties 31
- Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes 12
-
- Extraction and Separation Processes 9
-
- Radioactive contamination and transfer 7
Mark J. Sarsfield
77 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Inorganic Chemistry 1.9k
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 520
- Process Chemistry and Technology 125
- Organic Chemistry 886
- Materials Chemistry 1.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Mark J. Sarsfield
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark J. Sarsfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark J. Sarsfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark J. Sarsfield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark J. Sarsfield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark J. Sarsfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark J. Sarsfield. The network helps show where Mark J. Sarsfield may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark J. Sarsfield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 135 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 8 | PROGRESS ON 241Am PRODUCTION FOR USE IN RADIOISOTOPE POWER SYSTEMS | 2014 | 1 |
| 9 | 2012 | 66 | |
| 10 | Alternative Radioisotopes for Heat and Power Sources | 2011 | 2 |
| 11 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 46 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 22 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 51 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 66 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 109 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 35 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 74 |
About Mark J. Sarsfield
Mark J. Sarsfield is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 80 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radioactive element chemistry and processing (61 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (31 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Characterization (26 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (15 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (12 papers), Extraction and Separation Processes (9 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (7 papers) and Synthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (1.9k citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (520 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (125 citations). Mark J. Sarsfield has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Robin J. Taylor, Madeleine Helliwell, Madeleine Helliwell, Iain May, David Collison, Giuseppe Modolo, Andreas Wilden, Helen Steele, Colin Gregson and Chris Mason.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.