1.3k total citations 35 papers, 474 citations indexed
About
Mark J. Osiel is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Law.
According to data from OpenAlex, Mark J. Osiel has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 474 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Law. Recurrent topics in Mark J. Osiel's work include Global Peace and Security Dynamics (14 papers), International Law and Human Rights (11 papers) and Torture, Ethics, and Law (8 papers). Mark J. Osiel is often cited by papers focused on Global Peace and Security Dynamics (14 papers), International Law and Human Rights (11 papers) and Torture, Ethics, and Law (8 papers). Mark J. Osiel collaborates with scholars based in United States and Israel. Mark J. Osiel's co-authors include Richard Abel, Martin L. Cook, Martha Minow and Gary Jonathan Bass and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Harvard Law Review and Sociological Inquiry.
In The Last Decade
Mark J. Osiel
33 papers
receiving
357 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark J. Osiel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark J. Osiel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark J. Osiel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark J. Osiel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark J. Osiel. The network helps show where Mark J. Osiel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark J. Osiel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark J. Osiel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark J. Osiel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark J. Osiel. Mark J. Osiel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Osiel, Mark J.. (2015). 'Transitional Justice' in Israel/Palestine? Symbolism and Materialism in Reparations for Mass Violence. Ethics & International Affairs.1 indexed citations
Osiel, Mark J., et al.. (2013). Proportionality in Military Force at War’s Multiple Levels: Averting Civilian Casualties vs. Safeguarding Soldiers. Iowa Research Online (The University of Iowa). 46(3). 747.2 indexed citations
4.
Osiel, Mark J.. (2010). Ascribing Individual Liability Within a Bureaucracy of Murder. Iowa Research Online (The University of Iowa). 105.1 indexed citations
Osiel, Mark J.. (2009). How Should the ICC Office of the Prosecutor Choose Its Cases? The Multiple Meanings of ‘Situational Gravity’, ”. Iowa Research Online (University of Iowa). 113.
Osiel, Mark J.. (2005). The Banality of Good: Aligning Incentives Against Mass Atrocity. Columbia Law Review. 105(6). 1751–1862.28 indexed citations
12.
Cook, Martin L. & Mark J. Osiel. (2001). Obeying Orders: Atrocity, Military Discipline & the Law of War. Naval War College review. 54(2). 17.6 indexed citations
Osiel, Mark J.. (1984). The politics of professional ethics.. PubMed. 15(1). 43–8.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.