Mark H. Harpster
- Plant Science top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 10%
- Biotechnology top 5%
- Co-authors
- David A. BrummellPamela DunsmuirPatrick A. JohnsonWilliam C. TaylorWilliam C. WilsonJoseph M. PalysPedro M. CivelloA. B. Bennett
- Topics
- Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (7 papers)Plant tissue culture and regeneration (7 papers)Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Mark H. Harpster
32 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Plant Science 2.2k
- Molecular Biology 1.5k
- Biomedical Engineering 393
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 284
- Biotechnology 184
Countries citing papers authored by Mark H. Harpster
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark H. Harpster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark H. Harpster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark H. Harpster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark H. Harpster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark H. Harpster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark H. Harpster. The network helps show where Mark H. Harpster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark H. Harpster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark H. Harpster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark H. Harpster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark H. Harpster. Mark H. Harpster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 43 | |
| 7 | 130 | |
| 8 | 76 | |
| 9 | 57 | |
| 10 | 56 | |
| 11 | 33 | |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 145 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 84 | |
| 17 | 57 | |
| 18 | 110 | |
| 19 | 60 | |
| 20 | 71 |
About Mark H. Harpster
Mark H. Harpster is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Plant Science and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 34 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (7 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (7 papers) and Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (2.2k citations), Molecular Biology (1.5k citations) and Biotechnology (184 citations). Mark H. Harpster has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include David A. Brummell, Pamela Dunsmuir, Patrick A. Johnson, William C. Taylor, William C. Wilson, Joseph M. Palys, Pedro M. Civello, A. B. Bennett, Stephen P. Mayfield and Hao Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Journal of Biological Chemistry and The Journal of Cell Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.