Mark Forrest

943 total citations
22 papers, 249 citations indexed

About

Mark Forrest is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Forrest has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 249 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 4 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Mark Forrest's work include Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (3 papers) and Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers). Mark Forrest is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (3 papers) and Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers). Mark Forrest collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and United States. Mark Forrest's co-authors include Bjørn Andersen, Alison McDonald, John Norrie, Seonaidh Cotton, Gladys McPherson, Kathryn N. Porter Starr, Kirsty McCormack, Graeme MacLennan, Karen Innes and Siladitya Bhattacharya and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and BMJ.

In The Last Decade

Mark Forrest

21 papers receiving 245 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Forrest United Kingdom 8 52 43 41 37 35 22 249
Avisek Datta United States 12 46 0.9× 35 0.8× 103 2.5× 72 1.9× 36 1.0× 21 283
Ken Guire United States 9 70 1.3× 67 1.6× 82 2.0× 59 1.6× 20 0.6× 11 341
Amanda Banaag United States 9 72 1.4× 23 0.5× 71 1.7× 30 0.8× 10 0.3× 63 293
Johnathan A. Khusid United States 9 55 1.1× 35 0.8× 26 0.6× 66 1.8× 106 3.0× 41 254
Rowena W Elliott United Kingdom 10 37 0.7× 63 1.5× 53 1.3× 58 1.6× 53 1.5× 23 317
Albert Botchway United States 10 23 0.4× 87 2.0× 36 0.9× 12 0.3× 89 2.5× 27 388
Lori Parker United States 6 96 1.8× 47 1.1× 80 2.0× 11 0.3× 17 0.5× 10 350
Meryem Merve Ören Türkiye 14 32 0.6× 96 2.2× 36 0.9× 14 0.4× 28 0.8× 61 628
Anne Richard France 11 47 0.9× 39 0.9× 60 1.5× 106 2.9× 30 0.9× 34 332
Z. Stan Wisniewski Australia 13 64 1.2× 140 3.3× 51 1.2× 63 1.7× 91 2.6× 21 467

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Forrest

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Forrest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Forrest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Forrest more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Forrest

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Forrest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Forrest. The network helps show where Mark Forrest may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Forrest

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Forrest. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Forrest based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Forrest. Mark Forrest is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Innes, Karen, Irfan Ahmed, Jemma Hudson, et al.. (2023). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conservative management for adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones: the C-GALL RCT. Health Technology Assessment. 28(26). 1–151.
3.
Turner, Steve, Seonaidh Cotton, Edwin Amalraj Raja, et al.. (2022). Treatment guided by fractional exhaled nitric oxide in addition to standard care in 6- to 15-year-olds with asthma: the RAACENO RCT. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(4). 1–154. 2 indexed citations
4.
Cameron, Sharon, Anna Glasier, Lisa McDaid, et al.. (2021). Provision of the progestogen-only pill by community pharmacies as bridging contraception for women receiving emergency contraception: the Bridge-it RCT. Health Technology Assessment. 25(27). 1–92. 3 indexed citations
5.
Bugge, Carol, Rohna Kearney, Aethele Khunda, et al.. (2020). The TOPSY pessary self-management intervention for pelvic organ prolapse: a study protocol for the process evaluation. Trials. 21(1). 836–836. 2 indexed citations
7.
Lenguerrand, Erik, Cathy Winter, Dimitrios Siassakos, et al.. (2019). Effect of hands-on interprofessional simulation training for local emergencies in Scotland: the THISTLE stepped-wedge design randomised controlled trial. BMJ Quality & Safety. 29(2). 122–134. 22 indexed citations
8.
Cameron, Sharon, Paula Baraitser, Anna Glasier, et al.. (2019). Pragmatic cluster randomised cohort cross-over trial to determine the effectiveness of bridging from emergency to regular contraception: the Bridge-It study protocol. BMJ Open. 9(10). e029978–e029978. 7 indexed citations
11.
Lenguerrand, Erik, Catherine Winter, Karen Innes, et al.. (2017). THISTLE: trial of hands-on Interprofessional simulation training for local emergencies: a research protocol for a stepped-wedge clustered randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 17(1). 294–294. 11 indexed citations
12.
Denison, Fiona C., John Norrie, Julia Lawton, et al.. (2017). A pragmatic group sequential, placebo-controlled, randomised trial to determine the effectiveness of glyceryl trinitrate for retained placenta (GOT-IT): a study protocol. BMJ Open. 7(9). e017134–e017134. 3 indexed citations
13.
Starr, Kathryn N. Porter, Gladys McPherson, Mark Forrest, & Seonaidh Cotton. (2015). SMS text pre-notification and delivery of reminder e-mails to increase response rates to postal questionnaires in the SUSPEND trial: a factorial design, randomised controlled trial. Trials. 16(1). 295–295. 20 indexed citations
14.
Starr, Kath, Gladys McPherson, Mark Forrest, & Seonaidh Cotton. (2015). SMS text pre-notification and delivery of reminder e-mails to increase response rates to postal questionnaires: a factorial design, randomised, controlled trial. Trials. 16(S2). 3 indexed citations
15.
Moore, Claire E., Mark Forrest, & Basil J. Ammori. (2011). Anaesthesia for obesity surgery. Anaesthesia & intensive care medicine. 12(7). 280–282. 4 indexed citations
16.
Bostofte, E., Mark Forrest, & Bjørn Andersen. (2009). Regression Toward the Mean in Fertility Research - An Empirical Study of Semen Quality. Andrologia. 19(1). 76–79. 1 indexed citations
17.
Siegel, Michael Alan, César A. Migliorati, Inés Vélez, & Mark Forrest. (2007). Exposed bone in the palate. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 138(10). 1341–1343. 3 indexed citations
18.
Forrest, Mark. (1989). Assessment of pain: a comparison between patients and doctors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 33(3). 255–256. 26 indexed citations
19.
Forrest, Mark, et al.. (1987). [Misuse of statistics. If neither SD nor SE--what then?].. PubMed. 102(4). 141–2. 2 indexed citations
20.
Forrest, Mark & Bjørn Andersen. (1986). Ordinal scale and statistics in medical research.. BMJ. 292(6519). 537–538. 73 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026